[a. Ordinance Z-670-21]
[00:00:17]
>> I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THE LAND USE AND SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE OF THE CARMEL CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 2021 TO ORDER. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ORDINANCE Z670-21. AMENDING THE WESTCLAY VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE.
>> THANK YOU. COUNCILOR RIDER.
SO WE HAVE JUST RECENTLY RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM CORPORATE COUNSELOR. MR. JOHN OBERLANDER.
I'LL JUST READ THE EMAIL ITSELF.
IT SAYS GOOD AFTERNOON COUNSELORS.
THE ATTACHED LETTER WAS SENT BY EMAIL AND REGULAR MAIL TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE WESTCLAY GAS STATION PROJECT THIS AFTERNOON.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THE DEPARTMENT HAS MADE TH DETERMINATION THAT THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES 500 FOOT GAS STATION SETBACK DOES APPLY FOR THE WESTCLAY PUD.
THEREFORE, THE PROJECT WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THE TECH REVIEW MEETING FOR THE PROJECT THAT WAS SCHEDULED ON THE 15TH.
THAT HAS BEEN CANCELED. AS STATED IN THE LETTER, THE NEXT STEP IF THE APPLICANT CHOOSES TO TAKE IT IS TO APPEAL
THE DECISION TO THE BCA. >> CONSIDERING WHAT WE JUST
[b. Ordinance Z-672-21]
RECEIVED TODAY? IT IS THE TERMINATION OF THE CHAIR THAT WE WILL TABLE THIS AND LEAVE IT IN COMMITTEE FOR NOW. SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE ON THIS.ITEM NUMBER 2, ORDINANCE Z672-21 AND ORDINANCE REZONING FIVE ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 20 140 E. 116TH STREET IN THE MERCHANTS SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER FROM BA BUSINESS DISTRICT TO SEE TWO MIXED USE DISTRICT.
MR. (NAME). >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
THANK YOU FOR HOLDING THIS HEARING SO QUICKLY.
I LIKE TO CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THE PACKET DATED NOVEMBER 23. DO YOU HAVE COPIES OF THAT? I BROUGHT EXTRAS IF YOU NEED THEM.
IN THAT MEMORANDUM, THERE IS THE BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE REASON REQUEST. AS WELL AS SOME CONTEXT AERIAL.
AERIAL MAP. ZONING MAP.AND THE CONCEPT FOR THE MERCHANTS SQUARE MASTER PLAN.
THIS PROJECT WOULD PLUG INTO. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
>> SURE. SO DIRECTOR, WOULD YOU JUST REMIND ME AND MAYBE REMIND ANY INTERESTED FOLKS, THAT WHEN SOMETHING GOES FROM A B2 A C, IN THIS CASE THE C2, DOES THAT CHANGE THE REVIEW PROCESS? AS TO WHAT THOSE STEPS ARE FOR
ANY POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT? >> THE REVIEW PROCESS IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN HOW WE LOOK AT THEM IS THE ACTUAL END HEARING.
WHICH IS CONDUCTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OFFICER. BUT THERE IS STILL A PUBLIC HEARING. SO EVERYTHING IS ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF THE PLAN COMMISSION.
INCLUDING NOTICE, TECH REVIEW AND ULTIMATELY PUBLIC HEARING.
>> IF THIS THEN BECOMES AN ALLOCATION DISTRICT AS A C2, DOES THAT CHANGE THE REVIEW PROCESS?
>> THE REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS IS SEPARATE FROM THIS.
>> DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO ADD?
>> I HAVE A CLARIFICATION QUESTION FOR MIKE.
WOULDN'T CRC BE INVOLVED IN THE PREAPPROVAL PROCESS IN C2?
>> THE CRC HAS AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.
IT'S KIND OF AN EXTRA STEP. >> IT HAPPENS BEFORE -- IT TRANSFERS TO YOUR DEPARTMENT AND THEN IT FOLLOWS THE SAME
THAT IS CORRECT. >> JUST A CLARIFICATION.
THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
DO I HAVE A MOTION? >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD MOVE
[00:05:04]
THAT WE SEND Z672-21 BACK TO THE FLOOR WITH COUNSEL WITH AFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. >> SECOND.
>> ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.