[00:00:11]
>> GOOD MORNING. I APOLOGIZE FOR STARTING THE MEETING LATE. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. IT IS WEDNESDAY, JULY 5.
[1. MINUTES ]
SLIGHTLY AFTER 10:00 A.M. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA.THE MINUTES OF JUNE 21, 2023. OUR REGULAR MEETING.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE SAID MINUTES?
>> I MOVE APPROVAL. >> SECOND IN.
>> ANY CHANGES OR DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, ALL IN FAVOR, FOR APPROVING THE MINUTES OF JUNE 21, 2023, PLEASE INDICATE BY
[2. BID OPENING AND AWARD ]
THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. NEXT WE HAVE A BID OPENING FOR
BROOKSHIRE PAVING. >> HOWARD COMPANIES.
INDIANA LAW REQUIRES THAT ALL PUBLIC BIDS OVER A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF MONEY BE OPEN IN PUBLIC.
SO WE HAVE ADVERTISED THE BIDS, THE PUBLICATION ON-LINE.
NEWSPAPER AND THEN WE OPENED THEM IN PUBLIC.
SO EVERYBODY-- THE BIDS HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY THE CLERK.
WE ARE OPENING NOW FOR THE FIRST TIME TO SEE WHAT THE VARIOUS CONTRACTORS' BID FOR THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
SO BROOKSHIRE PROJECT, THE FIRST BID IS FROM --
>> HOWARD COMPANIES. >> HOWARD COMPANIES OF INDIANAPOLIS. THEIR BID FOR THIS PROJECT IS
>> RIETH RILEY'S BID IS SLIGHTLY MORE.
IT WOULD APPEAR THAT HOWARD HAD THE LOW BID, BUT IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY OUR STREET DEPARTMENT STAFF TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE BID IS ACTUALLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR REQUEST.
AND YOU WILL COME BACK THE NEXT MEETING.
YOU WANT TO DO IT TODAY? OKAY.
NEXT WE HAVE A BID AWARD FOR THE 106TH STRAIGHT LIFT EXPANSION PROJECT. IT IS A UTILITY PROJECT.
I SEE THE UTILITY DIRECTOR JOHN DUFFY COMING FORWARD.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE-- WELL, MR. DUFFY, YOU GO FIRST.
>> THANKS, MAYOR. FOR THE 106TH STREET LIFT EXPANSION PROJECT. THE DOLLAR AMOUNT IS $6,536.
THEY WERE THE LOWEST BIDDER. >> FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO MAY BE WATCHING AND TRYING TO LEARN, THE BIDS WERE OPEN AT THE LAST MEETING. MR. DUFFY IS IN CHARGE OF THAT DEPARTMENT AND HAS BEEN REVIEWING THEM.
THIS IS HIS RECOMMENDATION. THE LOWEST AND MOST RESPONSIBLE.
ALL IN FAVOR FOR APPROVING THE RECOMMENDATION, PLEASE INDICATE
>> THE BID AWARD HAS BEEN MADE UNANIMOUSLY.
[3. PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION APPROVAL REQUEST ]
>> THE NEXT ITEM IS A REQUEST FOR A PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION. AND THAT IS A SUBARU ANNEX
EROSION CONTROL. >> I MOVE APPROVAL.
>> SECOND? >> ANY DISCUSSION? IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY OUR STAFF ALREADY.
PLEASE INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. >> AYE.
[4. CONTRACTS ]
>> 3-A IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. NEXT WE HAVE SIX CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMENDMENTS UNDER SECTION 4 ON THE AGENDA.
>> I MOVE APPROVAL OF 4-A THROUGH F.
>> SECOND. >> ANY DISCUSSION ON ANY OF THESE ITEMS? HEARING NONE, ALL IN FAVOR OF
APPROVING 4-A THROUGH F, >> AYE.
[5. REQUEST TO USE CITY STREETS/PROPERTY ]
>> 4-A THROUGH F ARE APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEXT WE HAVE VARIOUS REQUESTS TO USE CITY STREETS AND PROPERTY.
5 AFTER A THROUGH F IS LISTED ON THE AGENDA.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? >> I MOVE APPROVAL OF 5-A
>> ANY CONDITIONS ON YOUR -- >> OH, YES.
I'M SORRY. WITH ANY CONDITIONS OF THE CITY
ENGINEER BEING MET. >> CAN WE TAKE A THROUGH E,
[00:05:02]
>> 5-A. >> MS. WATSON HAS ASKED THAT WE REMOVE F FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING A-E, INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
>> AYE. >> NEXT, IS THERE A MOTION TO
APPROVE 5-F? >> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF 5-F.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THIS ITEM.
THERE ARE SOME CONCERNS. >> THIS IS FOR NEXT YEAR.
>> WHAT IS THE CONCERN, LORI? >> IT APPEARS THAT THE ORIGINAL CONCERT SERIES WAS NEVER APPROVED BY THE BOARD.
AND THIS IS FOR A PARKING CHANGE.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE IT TO THE NEXT MEETING.
>> OKAY. THERE IS PLENTY OF TIME.
IS THERE A SECOND? >> I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
>> YEAH. YOU ARE MOVING TO TABLE.
I'LL SECOND IT. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY
[6. OTHER ]
MAYBE WE CAN CALL MELANIE AND FIND OUT.NEXT WE HAVE 6-A THROUGH F. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? THESE ARE VARIOUS CONSENTS TO ENCROACH ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ISSUES AND EASEMENT ISSUES AND SO ON.
THEY HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF 6-A THROUGH F WITH ANY CONDITIONS OF
THE CITY ENGINEER BEING MET. >> SECOND.
>> ANY DISCUSSION? I HAVE A QUESTION.
START CITY FOR THE CITY ENGINEER.
HAS 6-A BEEN LOOKED AT CAREFULLY? THIS IS A REQUEST FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE SUED THE CITY ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. (INAUDIBLE).
>> GIVEN ISSUES WE HAVE HAD WITH THESE PROPERTY OWNERS, I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT WE TABLE THAT ONE AND MAKE CERTAIN THAT ALL THE I'S ARE DOTTED AND THE T'S CROSSED.
THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS LAWSUITS.
AND THE NEIGHBORS OF THE STREET FOR THIS PARTICULAR-- YES.
IS THERE A SECOND TO MY MOTION? >> TO TABLE 6-A?
>> ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE >> AYE.
>> AYE. >> IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE
WITH ANY CONDITIONS BEING MET FROM THE CITY ENGINEER.
>> SECOND. >> ANY QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY
>> 6B-F ARE APPROVED. IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD? ANY ADD-ONS?
>> OH, THAT'S RIGHT. YOU ARE COMING BACK WITH THE
RECOMMENDATION. >> GOOD MORNING.
CRYSTAL ED MONSON. THE STREET DEPARTMENT WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND BROOKSHIREPAVING BID TO HOWARD KRP ASPHALT LLC FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $7,64,660.
THEY WERE THE LOWEST AND RESPONSIVE BID.
>> IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL IN FAVOR, THEN, OF ACCEPTING THE BID AS REMITTED, PLEASE INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
>> PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU.
IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS. >> THE BOARD? OKAY. HEARING NONE, THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.