[00:00:10]
>> WELCOME TO THE CARMEL PLANNING COMMISSION OF A WHOLE,
[1. Docket No. PZ-2024-00099 DP/ADLS: Spring Mill Shops.]
I THINK THAT IS WHAT WE ARE CALLING IT THESE DAYS. FOR ANYONE AT HOME, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMITTEE COMBINED. WE HEAR THESE MATTERS TOGETHER NOW. I WILL READ AND DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2024-00099 DPL CAPITAL S.THE APPLICANT SEEKS DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR 3 NEW MULTITECH COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 14,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 116TH AND SPRINGVILLE WITHIN THE JACKSON'S GRANT VILLAGE. THE BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN SPECIFIC, THEY HAVE A SPECIFIC ADDRESS OF 116-751-1745 AND 11785 VILLAGE CORNER COURT. IT IS ZONED PUD UNDER THE JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE Z65230, FILED BY SHAWN MCKINNEY -- MCGINNIS, I KNEW THAT. PUBLIC IRRELEVANT, SORRY, SEAN.
AND WITH THAT, I WILL GIVE THE FLOOR TO THE PETITIONER. GO
AHEAD. >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SEAN CURRAN WITH CURRENT ARCHITECTURE. EASTER DRIVE IN INDIANAPOLIS. WE ARE HERE, THIS IS THE THIRD TIME WE HAVE BEEN TO SEE YOU GUYS. NICE TO SEE YOU ALL AGAIN. WE ARE HERE, HOPEFULLY, TO GET THIS OVER THE FINISH LINE. WE'VE GOT THE SITE PLAN IN FRONT OF YOU, THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHOWING THE THREE BUILDINGS, TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY, THE JACKSON'S GRANT RESIDENTIAL AREA IS TO THE NORTH, SPRINGVILLE TO THE EAST. AND 116TH STREET TO THE SOUTH. WE HAVE THE THREE BUILDINGS, AS I MENTIONED, AND I HAVE WORKED WITH RACHEL OVER THE LAST TWO MONTHS NOW TO REFINE THE DESIGN OF THE BILLING -- BUILDING ELEVATIONS. TO RESPOND TO YOUR COMMENTS AS WELL AS THE STAFF'S COMMENT, I THINK WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THAT. I HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH RACHEL, WE HAVE BROKEN UP BUILDING A LITTLE BIT MORE TO HELP INTRODUCE IT AS MORE OF A BUILD OVER TIME, I THINK THAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMENTS. THE FLAT ROOFS COMPLEMENT THE JACKSON'S GRANT RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. THIS IS BUILDING A, THE NORTH BUILDING. BUILDING B, WHICH IS THE CENTER BUILDING. THIS BUILDING PARALLELS SPRING MILL ROAD. AND THEN BUILDING C COMEDY SELF BUILDING, WHICH ALSO PARALLELS SPRING MILL ROAD AND IS A MIRROR IMAGE AND COMPLEMENTARY COLOR PALETTE TO BUILDING A AT THE NORTH END. SO THAT WAY, WHAT WE HAVE DONE, WE HAVE THREE BUILDINGS THAT ARE UNIQUE ENOUGH AND STILL COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER AND COMPLEMENTING THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. AND I THINK WHAT WE HAVE PUT TOGETHER IS SOMETHING THAT STAFF, HOPEFULLY IT IS SATISFACTORY, THEY ARE HAPPY WITH IT . AND THE COMMISSIONER ALSO APPRECIATES THE CHANGES WE MADE. IT
>> GREAT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. STAFF, COMMENTS?
>> THANK YOU. THEY HAVE MADE GREAT CHANGES TO THE BUILDING.
AND I INCLUDED BEFORE AND AFTERS IN THE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR YOU ALL. SO, WE ARE FINALLY THERE AS FAR AS THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE THREE BUILDINGS GO. UNFORTUNATELY, WE ARE NOT THERE ON THE ENGINEERING SIDE OF THINGS. WE STILL DO NOT HAVE FULL ENGINEERING PLANS GIVEN TO OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND STORMWATER REVIEW. SO, WHILE I RECOMMENDED A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, I STILL RECOMMEND THAT. BUT WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE THIS PROJECT UNTIL ALL OF THOSE PLANS ARE GIVEN TO US AND ARE FULLY REVIEWED. SO , IT IS UP TO YOU GUYS IF YOU WANT TO HOLD IT IN COMMITTEE HERE ANOTHER MONTH UNTIL WE GET ALL THE FINAL PLANS AND GET THEM REVIEWED, OR IF WE WANT TO FORWARD IT ON TO THE FULL PLANNING COMMISSION WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION, SUBJECT TO FINALLY GETTING ALL OF THE PLANS TO FINISH THIS PROJECT TO REVIEW. AND I JUST WILL NOT LET IT COME BACK ONTO THE AGENDA UNTIL WE HAVE THAT. SO, DEFINITELY WANT TO GET YOUR FEEDBACK TONIGHT ON THE ARCHITECTURE, AND I LET THE
[00:05:04]
PETITIONERS KNOW THAT WE STILL DO NOT HAVE ALL THAT WE NEED,BUT THAT IS WHERE WE ARE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SUCH A THOROUGH EXPLANATION. COMMISSIONERS? GO AHEAD,
COUNCILWOMAN . >> IS A REASON THE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SEMITIC TO ENGINEERING? IS THERE A HOLDUP? WHAT SEEMS TO BE THE ISSUE NEXT
>> WE SHOULD HAVE THEM WITHIN A FEW DAYS, FROM WHAT I
UNDERSTAND. >> I JUST WANT TO COMPLEMENT YOU ON THE DESIGN CHANGES, IT NO LONGER LOOKS LIKE A TORNADO TOOK OUT THE MIDDLE OF THE ROOF. SO IT IS MUCH IMPROVED.
AND WHEN YOU ARE READY, WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS IT GO BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, A RECOMMENDATION SUBJECT TO ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING ISSUES BEING SOLVED, SUCH AS WHAT YOU JUST SAID WEIRD I WILL MAKE THAT MOTION WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> I WILL SECOND THAT. TO MAKE A MOTION IN A SECOND, WE WILL CONTINUE DIALOGUE ON THE SUBJECT FOR A MOMENT BEFORE WE CALL THE MOTION INTO QUESTION. OR WE WILL NOT HAVE ANY MORE
DIALOGUE. >> THE STAFF REPORT SAYS THAT THE BOLDED ITEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED, DO WE STILL HAVE THE TOPIC OF THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS ARE HAS OFTEN ADDRESSED?
>> NO, NOT YET. THAT WOULD BE IN MY COUCH ALL OF, WE WILL FINISH OUT ALL THE THINGS ON THE PROJECT. ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED, THE LANDSCAPING PLAN DID NOT CHANGE AFTER CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE SITE PLAN. SO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS FINE. BUT SOME OF THE OTHER ITEMS, WE DO STILL NEED.
>> ARCHITECTURALLY, NOTHING IS PLANNING TO BE CHANGED. I KNOW YOU ARE WAITING IN ENGINEERING. SO EASY TONIGHT, THE COLORS THAT WERE BROUGHT IN LAST TIME, ALL THAT REMAINS THE SAME,
RIGHT? >> YES, ALL OF THAT REMAINS THE SAME. THE SITE PLAN IS GOOD, WE JUST DO NOT HAVE THE FINAL PLANS, WE DO NOT HAVE THE DRAINAGE DOCUMENT. WE NEED ALL OF THE SPECIFICS THAT ARE REQUIRED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN. >>'S ALL OF THE ROADS THAT HOW
PEOPLE ACCESS THE SITE -- >> YES, THE PARKING LAYOUT, EVERYTHING WILL STAY THE SAME. IT IS JUST THAT WE DO NOT HAVE THOSE DETAILS AND WE CANNOT --
>> THANK YOU FOR GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING TABLE, SO TO SPEAK.
IT LOOKS A LOT BETTER. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OKAY, GREAT. I WILL ALSO ECHO, I WILL GET TO YOU NEXT. I JUST WANTED TO ECHO THE NAME OF BRAD, NOT BEING HERE, I THINK THIS IS WHAT BRAD WAS HOPING FOR AS WELL . SO I APPRECIATE YOU PUSHING THE PENCIL TO THE PAPER AND MAKING IT HAPPEN. COUNCILWOMAN, DID YOU HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION?
>> JUST ANOTHER QUICK ONE CLARIFYING. I SEE THAT THERE ARE VARIANCES THAT WILL REQUIRE --
>> NO VARIANCES HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR YET.
>> THERE IS ONE FOR SIGNAGE, LOT COVERAGE.
>> LOT COVERAGE IS ONE OF THOSE DETAILS THAT WE JUST DO NOT KNOW YET, AND IT MAY BE IS OKAY, BUT IF IT IS NOT, THEY WILL HAVE TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE FOR THAT. OR GIVE US MORE GREEN
SPACE, AND IT WILL BE FINE. >> I LIKE THAT IDEA.
>> OKAY, THE MOTION ON THE TABLE, IN ESSENCE, SEND IT BACK TO THE FULL PLANNING COMMISSION, BARRING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION, BARRING ANY OUTSTANDING ITEMS FOR REVIEW, ET CETERA. THAT IS A MOTION THAT HAS BEEN SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION AS AND, SAY AYE. ANY THOSE
[2. Docket No. PZ-2024-00156 ADLS Amend: 401 Penn Exterior Building Modifications.]
OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT. THE MOTION WILL GO TO THE FULL PLANNING COMMISSION WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION . FOR SAKE OF PROCEDURE, I WILL GO AHEAD AND READ IN A DOCKET THAT IT APPEARS THE PETITIONER IS NOT PRESENT FOR , JUST FOR THE RECORD. DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2024-00156 A.D. LS AMEND.401 PENN EXTERIOR BUILDING MODIFICATIONS. THAT PETITIONER IS NOT PRESENT TODAY. THEREFORE, WE WILL BE TABLING THIS TO OUR NEXT COMMITTEE HEARING, UNTIL A POINT WHICH IT WILL EVENTUALLY FALL OFF, BUT SHOULD THEY SHOW UP, WE WILL
[00:10:03]
TAKE IT UP AT THE NEXT MEETING. SEEING THAT WE HAVE -->> I AM OUT OF THE -- AWARE OF THE REASON THEY ARE NOT HERE.
>> TAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? >>
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.