Feb 17, 2026 Carmel Plan Commission

[A. Call Meeting to Order]

[B. Pledge of Allegiance ]

[C. Roll Call ]

[D. Declaration of Quorum ]

[E. Approval of Minutes ]

[00:01:03]

PLAN COMMISSION.WILL YOU PLEASE JOIN US IN SAYING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

[F. Communications, Bills, Expenditures, & Legal Counsel Report ]

>>I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

[G. Reports, Announcements & Department Concerns ]

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR. SECRETARY IS CALL THE ROLL. >>

>> THANK YOU, WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. >> NOT IS THE APPROVAL OF

JANUARY MEETING. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE >> 2ND

>> ALL IN FAVOR? >>AYE >>OPPOSE? HEARING NONE THEY ARE APPROVED. NEXT IS COMMUNICATION EXPENDITURES AND LEGAL COUNCIL

REPORT. >> NOTHING TO REPORT. >> NOW WERE GOING TO TURN OVER

TO THE ANNOUNCEMENT THE DEPARTMENT CONCERNED. >> I WILL JUST GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON THE OUTCOME OF THE LAST COMMITTEE MEETING. WE HEARD THAT THE ADOS AMENDMENT FOR THE SHAKE SHACK AND COVER RESTAURANT THAT HAS APPROVE AND THEN ON ITEM ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT, THE 1ST ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED TOO MARCH 17. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

>> I JUST WANT TO ADD A COUPLE OF THINGS. OUR INVOLVEMENT IN THE HOUSING COMMISSION, MARCH 26 IS THE NEXT HOUSING COMMISSION MEETING IN THE CITY IS CONTRACTED WITH THE (INAUDIBLE) WHICH IS AN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM THAT SPECIALIZES IN MIDDLE HOUSING AND AS PART OF THAT, THEY WILL BE PRESENTING KIND OF MISSING MEDIA ANALYSIS OF OUR ZONING AND OFFER SOME RECOMMENDATION AND THERE'S A WORKSHOP PLANNED, STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP AFTERWARDS. THERE WILL BE A MORE FORMAL INVITE. NOW WE HOPE THAT YOU COULD AT

[2. Docket No. PZ-2025-00267 PPA: Baby Tracts Lot 31, Lot Split ]

THAT EXCELLENT AND SHORT. CONGRATULATIONS ON THAT. >> CONGRATULATION ADAM IT'S A GREAT ARTICLE. IF YOU HAVEN'T READ IT I HEARD EVERYBODY READ IT

. >> IT WAS REALLY FANTASTIC. SO WERE HONORED TO BE SITTING NEXT TO YOU. SO NOW WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON TO THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE AGENDA. WE HAVE 2 TONIGHT. OUR RULES WERE PUBLIC HEARING ARE THE PETITIONER WILL HAVE 15 MINUTES TO PRESENT. AFTER THAT WILL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND THERE WILL BE UP TO 20 MINUTES ALLOTTED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. AFTER THAT , THE PETITIONER WILL HAVE A

[00:05:08]

FILED BY MASON KLAIN ON BEHALF OF BRASON PROPERTIES LLC. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE

PETITIONER. >> MASON KLAIN WITH BRYSON PROPERTIES. THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE TONIGHT I GREATLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU ALL. YOU OWN THE PROPERTY AT 11005 CORNERS ST. WE ARE PROPOSING TO SPLIT THIS JUST OVER 1 ACRE PARCEL AND TO HAVE ACRE PARCEL. WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF RENOVATING THE EXISTING HOME THAT IS ON THAT PARCEL. THEN IN THE FUTURE, WE WOULD LOOK AT BUILDING RESIDENTS OF SOME KIND I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT THE STYLE RESIDENT.

BUT IT WOULD CONFORM WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS OBVIOUSLY WITHIN THE CITY.

THAT WOULD BE PRETTY SIMILAR TO SAME OUTLINE OF WHERE THE EXISTING HOME IS. I KNOW 1 OF THE MAIN CONCERN WAS THE AMOUNT OF THE WOODED AREA IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, WE HAVE AGREED TO 150 FOOT. 3 PRESERVATION EASEMENT, WHICH CAN SEE THIS KIND OF LIGHTING RIGHT HERE.THOSE WILL ALL BE STAYING PUT AND UNLESS NATURE HAS SOME KIND TO SAY ABOUT IT.

>> HAS ANYBODY HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION OF THIS POSITION? COMMON UP. WE WILL GIVE YOU 5 MINUTES AND TO SAVE YOUR NAME AND GENERALLY WHERE YOU LIVE.

>> MY NAME IS MICHELLE (INAUDIBLE) AND I LIVE DIRECTLY BEHIND THE PROPERTY. THAT ADDRESS IS 10826 BELMONT CIR. DIRECTLY BEHIND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

I'M ASKING YOU TO DENY THE REQUEST BECAUSE THE REQUIRED FINDINGS OF FACT CANNOT BE MADE. THE PROPOSAL CREATE A NEW BUILDING OF A LOT AND IT'S BEEN A DEEP, HEAVILY WOODED REAR YARD THAT CURRENTLY PROVIDES THE ONLY WORLD PRIVACY BUFFER BETWEEN OUR HOMES, A TREE IS MEANT ON PAPER WILL ACTUALLY NOT PRESERVE EXISTING MATURE CANOPY.

ONCE IS FRAGMENTED BY CONSTRUCTION, CANNOT BE REPLACED FOR DECADES. THIS INTRODUCED A NEW AND INCOMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN BEHIND EXISTING HOMES AND CAUSES A DIRECT NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. FOR THOSE REASONS I

RESPECTFULLY REQUEST DENIAL. >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND GENERALLY WHERE YOU LIVE.

>> I AM NATHAN SMITH I AM AT THE PROPERTY 2 DOORS DOWN FROM THE SHELF AT 10 85050 BELMONT CIR. I LIVED THERE SINCE 2005. I REQUESTED TO DENY THIS TO BECAUSE I'M GETTING READY TO PUT A BIG BACK PATIO OF $50,000 RENOVATION ON MY BACK. IT'S VERY PRIVATE . I'VE DONE A LOT OF WORK ON MY BACKYARD TO BEAUTIFY IT. I'M JUST A LITTLE FEARFUL OF AGAIN

HAVING A LOT MORE RENTALS ON THAT BACKLOG. >> SEEING NO ONE ELSE, WOULD

YOU LIKE TO RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS THAT YOU HEARD? >> THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING UP AND SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THAT. I WILL SAY 1 THAT 1 OF THE REASON WHY WILL OF THE HOMEPLACE COMMUNITY IS BECAUSE YOUR COMMENTS BECAUSE OF HOW MUCH A RESIDENT IN THAT AREA TRULY LOVE AND RESPECT THAT. I WANT TO SAY IT'S FOR LACK OF THE MOMENT OF 2 HOMES IN HOMEPLACE AREA. WE JUST FINISHED BUILDING A BRAND NEW CONSTRUCTION HOME

[00:10:12]

I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE HOME CURRENTLY AND IS MEANT BUT I CAN 100% GUARANTEED THAT WE OURSELVES ARE NONE OF OUR CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS OR ANYONE AS WE OWN THE PROPERTY. WILL BE TOUCHING OR REMOVING ANY OF THOSE TREES OF ANY KIND.

WE ACTUALLY ARE IN FAVOR OF THE PRIVACY BUFFER AND EVERYTHING FROM THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY TO WHATEVER WE DECIDE. IT IS TO BUILD THERE ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL IS SLIDE WE GREATLY LOVE THE HOMEPLACE AREA . WE WISH TO BE VERY NICE NEIGHBORS AND GOT ALONG WELL WITH EVERYBODY AND MAKE SURE THAT AGREEING WITH THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO DO AND MAKE

EVERYBODY HAPPY. >> THANK YOU FOR THE RECORD, ALEXIA LOPEZ WITH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE. THEY ARE PROPOSING TO SPLIT THIS 1 LOT INTO 2.

THE EXISTING HOME WILL REMAIN ON THE SOUTHERN LOT AND I BELIEVE EACH LOT WILL HAVE ITS OWN DRIVEWAY. THEY ARE PROPOSING THAT 154 3 PRESERVATION EASEMENT THAT WILL BE PLATED IS MEANT ON THE PLAT SO THAT THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO GET INTO THAT OR HAVE A CONTRACTION IN THERE. A LOT SIZE FOR BOTH LOT DO MEET THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND IS SIMILAR TO LARGER THAN OTHER LOTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.

THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS REQUESTED THE PETITION INSTALLER, ROADSIDE (INAUDIBLE) AND UNDER DRIVEWAY TO CONVEY DRAINAGE ALONG THE ROAD.I BELIEVE THE PETITIONER SAID. THAT THEY WILL DO THAT. SO THAT ADDRESS A CONCERN AND THE PROPOSED BLACK BECAUSE IT DOES MEET THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES WHICH ARE CLASSIFIED AS IS NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE COUNT PLAN. AND THE PLANT MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS ON THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> I WILL NOW OPEN UP TO COMMENTS FROM A FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS?

>> JUST FOR EVERYONE'S EDIFICATION, WOULD YOU OR YOUR 2 VISUAL DO AN ORIENTATION, NORTH-SOUTH, EAST-WEST AND SHOW WHERE THE STREETS ARE SO WE CAN MAKE SURE WE ARE UTILIZING IN

THE SAME WAY. >> I ABSOLUTELY CAN. THIS MIGHT HELP A LITTLE MORE BUT I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE THE ABILITY TO ZOOM IN THIS OR NOT FROM HERE. THIS IS WITH RIGHT HERE IS 111TH ST. THIS IS CORNEL STREET AND LOCATED RIGHT HERE. SO NORTH, SOUTH, IS AND WAS AGAIN IT'S HARD TO SEE RIGHT HERE BUT PROPOSED IT WOULD BE TO THE NORTH RIGHT HERE. AND HERE IS WHERE THE PROPOSED IT WOULD BE.

>> JUST A FOLLOW-UP, JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE PLAN IS TO PUT A RESIDENTIAL? AND DOES POINT OUT

WERE A DRIVEWAY WOULD BE? >> I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE THE ABILITY TO ZOOM OUT THIS.

ON HERE IT'S A LITTLE SMALLER. >> HOW CAN YOU ZOOM IT IN? >> I WILL TRY AS BEST AS I

CAN. >> THAT'S GOOD. >> YOU CAN SEE CURRENTLY, THERE

[00:15:01]

THERE'S A LITTLE OUTLINE RIGHT HERE, AND THAT SHOWS THE PROPOSED DRIVE AND THAT WOULD

BASICALLY TAKE WESTWARD EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE IS. >> AND OTHER QUESTIONS? AND

OTHER QUESTIONS? >> SO IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE I'M LOOKING AT GOOGLE MAPS, 2 HOUSES TO THE NORTH THEY SEEM TO BE A SMALLER LOT ALREADY. IS THAT A FAIR STATEMENT? THEY

LOOK LIKE THEY'RE ABOUT HALF ACRE LOT COMPARED TO 2 HOMES? >> I PERSONALLY JUST ON A PEOPLE RIGHT HERE, CAN ONLY SEE THE ONES THAT NORTH RIGHT HERE.BUT I BELIEVE YOU'RE ACCURATE. THEY ARE AROUND THE HALF ACRE

LOTS. >> I GUESS MY QUESTION IS IS THERE A SMALLER LOT IN THE

SUBDIVISION ALREADY? >> THEY ARE NOT ALL APRIL LOTS YES THERE ARE SEVERAL SMALLER LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. MOST WHICH RANGE FROM 60 FEET TO 75 MAYBE 70 FEET WIDE AND ARE THE WRITER WOULD BE ABOUT 60 FEET WIDE.

>> I AM LOOKING AT THE SAME GOOGLE MAPS YOU WERE LOOKING AT.

11001 CORNELL AND 11095 CORNELL, THE BUFFER FOR THOSE BACKYARD IS MUCH TIGHTER (INAUDIBLE). YOU'RE NOT GOING TO TOUCH THAT? IT'S JUST THE PARCEL OF IMMEDIATELY NORTH TO

CORRECT 11005? >> YES >> WILL BEEN BUILDING IN CARMEL FOR 32 YEARS. I'M A THIRD-GENERATION BUILDER OF FAMILY IN CARMEL SO WILL LOVE BEING HERE. WE LOVE WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY AND WERE HAPPY TO OBLIGE WITH AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S HAPPY WITH THEM.

>> QUESTIONS IS MORE OF A COMMENT. LOOKING AT THE GIS AND SOME OF THE SURROUNDING LOTS, IT DOES LOOK LIKE MOST OF THOSE AREA, SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 6165 WITH AN WITH

. >> THE LOT WILL RUN & >> YOU'RE CREATING TO LOTS

NORTH AND SOUTH OCCUR? >> YES >> YOU'RE ALSO PROVIDING 154 IS

MEANT OR PRESERVATION? >> I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM A FEW THINGS, AS WERE A TREE PRESERVATION MEANT YOUR FINE WITH SHOWING THAT ON PEOPLE HAVE 150 FOOT BUFFER? I KNOW WE ALWAYS ASK THE 3 PRESERVATION BUT I DROVE BY AND I LOOK AT THIS, THERE IS A PILE OF STICKS AND THERE'S SOME TREES THAT ARE LEANING AND WE COULD HAVE CLEAN UP AND TAKE OUT THE DEAD TREES. TO THE EXTENT THERE IS A DEAD TREES AND REMOVE THEM AND REPLACE THEM WITH NONINVASIVE SPACES. I APPRECIATE THAT YOU'RE WILLING TO DO THAT AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THE CONSTRUCTION NOT GOING TO GET INTO THE TREES. AND LEARN AS FAR AS, YOU'RE WILLING TO COMMIT TO DOING THE (INAUDIBLE) ON THE FRONT?

>> THERE IS CURRENTLY A CULVERT FOR THE NORTH ARE SO RIGHT HERE. IT SEEMS AS IF THE HIGHEST PORTION IS KIND OF OUR PROPERTY LINE RIGHT HERE WITH THE SOUTH PARCEL. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE SMALL PRINT OUT BUT IT SHOWN HERE. AND THOSE WHO WOULD MOST HAVE LIKELY DRAIN TO THE NORTH JUST BASED ON THE NATURAL

[00:20:08]

ELEVATION OF THE LAND. >> YOU KNOW ON THE STREET, KIND OF PERMITS, THERE IS DUPLEXES.

OLDER HOMES HAS BEEN TURN OUT AND CONSTRUCTION COMING UP NOW. THE SYSTEMS THIS IS PART OF THE TREND OF WHERE THE STREET IS MOVING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

>> I JUST WANT TO VERIFY YOU SAID THERE WILL BE NO TREES COMING DOWN IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, I HAVE BEEN OUT OF TOWN AND UNFORTUNATELY, HAVE BEEN DRIVEN BY HERE. I WISH I HAD. BUT ARE THERE ANY OTHER TREES COMING DOWN JUST SO I UNDERSTAND?

>> SURE WE WILL OR NONE OF THE TREES IN THIS WHOLE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. WE WILL BE TOUCHING ACTUALLY WALK BACK THERE A FEW TIMES AND THERE MAY SEEM TO BE I'M NOT A TREE EXPERT, BUT WE WILL IN THE FUTURE BASED ON AGAIN WE HAVE NO SPECIFIC PLANS DRAWN UP BASED ON HOWEVER THOSE PLANES LOOK. THERE ARE SOME TREES AT THE MOMENT WERE A PROPOSALS WOULD BE BUT NEARLY ENOUGH FOR A COMPARISON TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. THOSE ARE BUNCHED TOGETHER, YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S WOODED HERE AND MORE OF OUR RESIDENTIAL YARD THAT'S HAS SOME TREES.IF THERE IS A TREE THAT'S LOCATED RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF WERE THE HOME WOULD BE, OBVIOUSLY WE WOULD HAVE TO GET RID OF THOSE BUT AS WE GET RID OF THOSE, WE WOULD PLAN SOME AS WELL TO GO ALONG WITH THE LANDSCAPING OF

THE ART. >> SO THERE IS NO CONCERN OF THE TREES ON THE NORTH END? ON

THE EAST AND I GUESS? >> FOR THIS AREA? >> YES THAT AREA.

>> ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PARCEL, FROM WHAT WE HAVE UNDERSTOOD FROM THE CITY OF CARMEL HERE, THERE HAS NOT BEEN IS MEANT OR ANYTHING PROPOSE.

>> THIS WORD IS ALREADY AN EXISTING SUBDIVISION THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PRESERVE AN INTEREST WITH THIS LOT SPLIT. THEY ARE OFFERING UP A LARGE EASEMENT ON THE BACK IN THE EAST. I THINK WERE HAPPY WITH THAT TREE PRESERVATION AND WHAT I UNDERSTAND IF YOU

NEED SOME DOWN IN THE FRONT FOR LIKE A NEW HOME. >> HAVE YOU TALKED WITH THE

FAMILY THAT LIVES BEHIND THE PROPERTY AT ALL? >> I HAVE NOT DISCUSS ANYTHING WITH THEM RECENTLY. I JUST RECEIVED THE EMAIL ABOUT AN HOUR BEFORE THE MEETING TODAY. THE HOMEOWNERS OF THE SOUTH RIGHT HERE ACTUALLY DID EMAIL US ABOUT A MONTH AGO. I DID SEND A RESPONSE AND JUST NEVER HEARD THAT BUT WE DID SEND OUR COMMENT AND TRYING TO IS THERE CONCERN AND SHOWING WHAT WERE TRYING TO COOPERATE

AS BEST AS POSSIBLE WITH THE COMMUNITY. >> WHAT WERE SOME OF THEIR

CONCERN? >> THEIR CONCERNS MAINLY WERE JUST WORK ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE THAT COULD POTENTIALLY DAMAGE ANYTHING THEY HAVE. LIKE I HAVE MENTIONED WAS GOING TO BE THE INTERIOR OF THE HOME AND THE DRIVE THAT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE. IT WAS REALLY JUST PRESERVING THE PROPERTY AND THE SHARED PROPERTY LINE TO THE SOUTH.

AS I MENTIONED WE WON'T BE DOING ANY WORK OVER THERE THAT MAY BE SOME

LIKE MINOR LANDSCAPE WORK. >> YOU MIGHT WANT TO TALK WITH THE FAMILY THAT LIVES BEHIND THE HOUSE AND WALK IT AND EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING.

BUT JUST TO, YOU CAN WORK AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE ON THIS DEVELOPMENT.

>> ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU. >> AND OTHER QUESTION? >> FOR THE FOLKS IN THE AUDIENCE AND FOLKS THAT MAY BE WATCHING ONLINE, I THINK 1 OF THE COMMON MISCONCEPTION, WERE SITTING UP HERE AND DELIBERATING ON THE PROJECT IS THAT THERE IS IN FULL CONTROL GIVEN OVER A PARTICULAR PROJECT . I THINK THE COMMON MISCONCEPTION IS THAT REZONING, THERE ARE A LOT MORE CONTROL THAT CAN COMMISSION IN CITY COUNCIL HAVE. WERE ASKED WITH THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, AS LONG AS DAY THE

[00:25:11]

IT'S VERY CHALLENGING FOR A PLANE COMMISSION TO DENY IT. IT'S IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT. WE MAY NOT LIKE DEVELOPMENT AND I'M NOT SPEAKING FOR ANYONE UP HERE, WHILE WE MIGHT NOT LIKE THE DEVELOPMENT WHETHER OR NOT WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO STOP. IT IS A CHALLENGE WHEN THE PETITIONER HAS MET ALL THE ZONING REQUIREMENT. IN THIS CASE, THE PETITIONER HAS SHOWN GREAT FAITH IN FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENTS.

I THINK YOU KNOW THAT IT IS A TESTAMENT TO WHAT YOU'VE DONE. WANTING TO BUILD RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY BUT I JUST FEEL LIKE THE DISTINCTION IS IMPORTANT.

>> IT WAS A VERY GOOD POINT. WHEN WERE DEALING WITH SUBDIVISION ESPECIALLY MINOR SUBDIVISION WHICH THIS 1 HAPPENS TO BE. IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT COMPILER DEVELOPMENT PLAN REZONE ADL AS A CHARTER. IN FACT, IT WAS A LITTLE BIT HARDER. IF YOU FIND THAT OVER THE REQUIREMENTS OF UBL IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.

>> THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP AND THAT'S A GREAT EXPLANATION. AND WE HAVE A LOT OF THIS WAS COMING UP IN THE PAST AND IN MY KNOWLEDGE I THINK IN A LARGE PART BECAUSE THE WORK THAT'S GOING ON PRIOR TO GETTING IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THEY HAVE ALL WITH APPROPRIATE I DO RECALL 1 WERE THEY DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND THEN WE HAD TO SAY NO. AT LEAST NOT IN MAY 10 YEARS. IN OTHER COMMENTS? IS THERE A

[3. Docket No. PZ-2025-00268 DP: US 421 – WCD Development Plan]

MOTION? >> I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVED DOCKET EASY 2025

00267. >> SECOND. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY, AYE? ? BUT WITH THE 3 CONDITION OR AIMING TO CONDITION PLEASE SAY AYE?

>> I >> OPPOSE? HEARING NONE YOUR APPROVAL.

>> IS 2ND PUBLIC HEARING. DOCKET NUMBER EASY 2025 00268 DP.THE APPLICANT SEEKS DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW APARTMENT COMMUNITY WITH COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL USES ALONG MICHIGAN ROAD. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT 9998 N MICHIGAN ROAD AND IS ZONED US 421 WCD PUD/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (ORDINANCE Z-697-25). FILED BY JIM SHINAVER AND JON DOBOSIEWICZ OF NELSON & FRANKENBERGER ON BEHALF OF

EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC. >> GOOD EVENING FOR THE RECORD JIM FOR ATTORNEY WITH THE LAW FIRM OF NELSON AND (INAUDIBLE) WITH OFFICE HERE IN CARMEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.

BY THE WAY OF BACKGROUND, SUBJECT REAL ESTATE WHICH IS BEFORE YOU_IN AND WAS INCLUDED BEHIND TAB TO OFFER YOUR INFORMATIONAL BROCHURE WAS THE FORMER HEADQUARTERS OF RESORT CONDOMINIUMS NATIONAL. LAST FALL, WE BROUGHT FORWARD IN BEHALF OF THE AD WORDS ROW STEAMERS ON REQUEST TO PUD THAT WAS THE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHO ISSUED A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL AND ULTIMATELY, THE COUNCIL ADOPTED THAT. THE REQUEST WHICH IS KNOWN AS THE US 421 WCD. THE ORDINANCE.

THIS IS THE NEXT PHASE IN THAT PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THE REAL ESTATE. WERE SEEKING DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL AND WE WILL BE SEEKING IN A LATER DATE THE ADL AS APPROVAL FOR THE BUILDING DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE. BUT RIGHT NOW, WERE SEEKING THIS 1ST PHASE TO GET THE SITE PLAN LAID OUT REVIEW BY THE PLAN COMMISSION SO THAT WE CAN TAKE SOME OF THOSE NEXT STEP. THE SUBJECT WILL STATE THAT YOU MAY BE SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH IF MOST OF YOU ARE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT TIME. IS APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES SHOWN ON THE OVERHEAD EXHIBIT. HERE IT IS ON THE WEST SIDE ADJACENT TO MICHIGAN ROAD AND ADJUST NORTH OF 99TH ST. AND SOUTH OF THE RETAIL PART WAY . SO 1990 STREET, MICHIGAN ROAD RETAIL PART WAY AND THE 22 ACRE BORDERED IN YELLOW. WE DID PROVIDE IT TO THE STAFF

[00:30:05]

WE HAVE RITA PARKWAY, THERE WILL BE AN ACCESS TO MICHIGAN ROAD IN 2 LOCATIONS, ALSO THROUGH W. 99TH ST. AS YOU MIGHT RECALL, DURING THE REZONE PHASE, THERE WAS DISCUSSION ABOUT 1 OF OUR NEIGHBOR ACRES. THE EDWARD GROSJEAN DID MAKE SURE THAT THE REACH OF BEFORE TONIGHT'S MEETING TO LET (INAUDIBLE) KNOW THAT THE REQUEST HAD BEEN FILED PROVIDED THEM PLANS RELATED TO THE REQUEST. IN ADDITION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, NOTICE THAT OF COURSE THEY AGAIN WANT TO & THEY HAVE INCLUDED BEHIND TOP 4 AND TOP 5 RESPECTIVELY. AS I SAID, I WASN'T CLEAR WHEN I STATED OUT THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUEST IS FOR MULTIFAMILY AREA OF THE UNDERLYING PROPOSAL. AS WELL AS YOU WILL RECALL, THERE WAS A RETAIL AREA THAT IS ADJACENT TO MICHIGAN ROAD. WERE NOT SEEKING DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PARTICULAR PORTION OF THE PROJECT. AT THIS TIME, EDWARD ROSE WANTS TO WAIT UNTIL THEY HAVE AN AND YOU SIR THAT THEY ARE WORKING WITH SO THAT THEY CAN BE MORE SPECIFIC AND HOW THE AREA WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OF COURSE EVENTUALLY, ADLS PLAN FOR THE RETAIL AREA. LAST FEW THINGS I WANTED TO GO OVER LATER THE STAFF REPORT, WE UNDERSTAND WERE COMING TO COMMITTEE IN MARCH, BUT I GUESS I WANTED TO FORESHADOW SOME OF THE RESPONSES THAT WERE WORKING ON. IF YOU'RE ABLE TO PULL OFF YOUR STAFF REPORT FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR MATTER, WHICH WOULD BEGIN ON PAGE 4 JUST TO GO THROUGH A COUPLE OF THE ITEMS THAT THE STAFFERS HIGHLIGHTED THAT THE EDWARD ROSE TEAM IS DILIGENTLY WORKING ON. PAGE 4, WHICH WOULD BE THE 1ST PAGE OF THE STAFF REPORT UNDER THE PD CENTER THAT ARE UNKNOWN. THE LATE FALL, LESTER, I REACH OUT TO THE COUNCIL OR ABOUT THE ASPECT BECAUSE IT WAS DETERMINED BY EDWARD ROSE THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO UTILIZE THE GLOBE ON SITE AND SENT IT WAS COUNSELOR (INAUDIBLE) DISTRICT, I WANTED TO REACH OUT TO HER 1ST.

THROUGHOUT THE LAST FEW MONTHS, BUT HAS RECENTLY HIS LAST WEEK, SO THAT IS UNDERWAY AND THAT WILL OCCUR WHETHER IT'S JUST VERY MUCH 2ND. NEXT TOPIC UNDER THE SAME HEADING REGARDING WILL STOP, EDWARD ROSE WILL BE PROVIDING WILL STOP FOR PERPENDICULAR PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK. WHEN WE RESUBMIT THE REVISED PLAN THROUGH ELECTIONS, THOSE WILL BE SHOWN ON THOSE UPDATED PLANS REGARDING BIKE WORKING AGAIN.

THAT WILL ALSO BE SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LET ME SEE. THE REQUIREMENT.

SO THAT WILL BE SOMETHING THAT YOU WILL SEE AT THE NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING. WHEN YOU LOOK UNDER AN EXCITING OF UNDER THE SITE PLAN AND PARKING, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE WERE

[00:35:08]

THE LAST ITEM, IT WOULD BE ON PAGE 5, WE WILL BE PROVIDING ESSENTIAL GRADING INFORMATION ABOUT THE FLOOD PROTECTION GRADES AND AGAIN RETENTION PONDS IN THE ENGINEERED CIVIL PLANS FOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. AGAIN THOSE WILL BE SUBMITTED THROUGH A LECTURE AND ALSO DISTRIBUTED ENGINEERING UNDER REVIEW. IF YOU GO ON PAGE'S 6 UNDER THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, THAT COMMENT REFERRED TO A BIKE SHORT TERM. BIKE PARKING LOCATIONS AGAIN, THOSE WILL BE SHOWN IN OUR UPDATED PLANS. THERE KNOWN AS WERE THEY WERE GOING TO EXIST TAKE UNDER THE LANDSCAPE HEADING. 1 OF THE ITEMS WAS FINALLY, UNDER THE REMAINING DOCS COMMENTS, I KNOW IT'S HIGHLY REDUNDANT BUT AGAIN WITH TALK ABOUT THE GLOBE ISSUE LET'S BEEN WORK ON. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THE WHEEL, STOP LOCATION ON THE PLAN BEING WORKED ON, BUT LOCATIONS, THEN ALSO THE FINAL WOUND WAS MORE DETAILS REGARDING THE DESIGN AND FINAL LOCATION OF THE RETAILING WALLS AROUND THE POND WHICH AGAIN WERE WORKING ON. I KNOW THAT WAS A BIT OF A DETAIL BUT JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW. WITH THAT SAID, AGAIN, IN A LATER DATE, EDWARD ROSE WILL BE FILING THE ADOS APPLICATION FOR THE ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING DESIGN FOR THE MULTIFAMILY AREA. BUT WITH THAT SAID, I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND I WILL

REMAIN AVAILABLE FOR ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >> THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IS THERE ANYBODY HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR IN A POSITION ARE DISPOSITION?

>> SEEING NONE, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE COMMITTEE COMMENTS.

>> FOR THE RECORD, ALEXA LOPEZ WITH THE PLANNING ZONING OFFICE. THE APPLICANT 6 APPROVAL THIS EVENING FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE US 421 WC DEVELOPMENT AS THEY STATED THAT ADOS PORTION FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE BUILDING WILL BE COMING AT A LATER DATE. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSED JUST FOLLOW THE. BECAUSE A PLAN. PERFECTLY, I WOULD SAY THAT'S ALSO GREAT TO SEE. NOT A LOT OF CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE FOR YOU GUYS REVIEWED IN THE PUD. THERE ARE 7 MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS AND THE MAINTENANCE BUILDING WITH INDOOR BIKE PARKING PROPOSE. THEY ARE SHOWING TO DOG PARKS IN THE OUTDOOR GATHERING AREA WEST OF BUILDING 7 ON THE SITE PLAN.

AS I MENTIONED, THEY WERE THE PED THUS REQUIRED POOL, SUNDECK, CANNIBALS AND THOSE ARE DETAILS THAT HAD NOT PROVIDED. THAT'S KIND OF WHERE WE WERE MAKING SURE WE APPRECIATE IT. SOMETHING ON THE SITE PLAN THEN, ASSUMING IT WILL BE BACK FOR WITH THE ADL AS OF MORE DETAILS OF THE AREA. 573 PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSE AND 540 ARE REQUIRED SO THEY ARE MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT. THEY ARE SHOWING TO DETENTION PONDS THAT ARE ESSENTIALLY LOCATED. AND WILL HAVE RETAINING WALLS AROUND PORTION OF THOSE.

YOU KNOW, THERE'S GOING TO BE LANDSCAPING ALONG THAT. IT IS GOING TO BE AN ABRUPT KIND OF WALL. THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THE COMMENTS THAT WE HAD ON JUST KIND OF WANTING TO SEE MORE OF WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE. THEY DID SUBMIT A DRAFT WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT FOR THE WOODED AREA. THE NORTHWEST CORNER FOR THAT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE SOME ESSENTIAL GRADING AND SITE INFORMATION ABOUT FLOOD PROTECTION, GRADES AND RETENTION PONDS. I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE PROVIDING THAT HOPEFULLY BEFORE COMMITTEE. I DON'T KNOW THAT HOW FAR WE'D WANT IF WE GET ALONG. THE PD THE THUS REQUIRE DEVELOPER TO SEEK APPROVAL FOR

[00:40:08]

>> IS A MAJOR 1. THAT THE GLOBE OUT FRONT WAS A REPLICA OF THE ORIGINAL SMALL GROUP. I THINK THE MAYOR SAID THAT MAY BE IN THE FOUND HAS IT THE ORIGINAL 1. ARE YOU GOING TO KEEP THAT?

OR IS THAT SOMETHING YOU'RE GOING TO TRANSITION? >> NATHAN EDWARD ROSE. WE ARE PLANNING ON EXPLORING, INCORPORATING THE SMALL GLOBE INTO THE PROJECT SO THAT

SOMETHING WERE EXPLORING AND LOOKING AT. >> I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS THE CASE BUT NOW THEY HAVE CLOSE ON THE PROPERTY AND THEY HAVE COMPLETE ACCESS RIGHTS. I'M SURE IT WAS LIKE OUR SCAVENGER HAND GOING THROUGH ALL THE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS AND OFFICES AND STORAGE ROOM. I KNOW THAT MIGHT NOT SEEM

RELEVANT BUT I'M GLAD THEY FOUND A SMALL GLOW. >> ANOTHER QUESTION?

>> GENERAL QUESTION HERE, THE KIND OF THE VISUAL ASPECT OF THE POND AREA AND THE POOL WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO HAVE SOME SORT OF KIND OF 3D VISUALIZATION OF WHAT THAT WILL LOOK LIKE FOR OUR NEXT MEETING? AND THEN, I'M CURIOUS TO HOW BIG THE POOL IS. IT'S A REALLY

AWESOME LOCATION IN MY OPINION. >> BEFORE THEY PROVIDE THE ANSWER ON THE POOL SIZE, LET ME SHARE WITH YOU SOME OF THE EXHIBIT THAT HAVE INCLUDED IN THE PUD AS CONCEPTUAL EXHIBIT BUT REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WHEN WE COME TO THE ADL AS STAGE. WHAT WERE GOING TO SEE MORE ON THE ADL AS SIDE, HERE'S 1 OF THE MAJOR PERSPECTIVE. I'M LOOKING OVER THE POND AREA INTO SOME OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. ADDITIONALLY, THIS WAS INCLUDED BEHIND EXHIBIT THE AGAIN TO THE PD SHOWING BUILDING DESIGN AND HOW IT INTO PLACE WITH SOME OF THE POND AREA LOCATIONS AND RETAINING WALLS AND THEN THIS IS THE 1 OF THE PRIMARY MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS ALONG THE INTERNAL BOULEVARD. IT ALSO SHOWS SOME OF THE CARRIER, TREATMENT ELEMENTS AS WELL. FINALLY, WE HAD ANOTHER BOULEVARD PROSPECTIVE

THROUGHOUT THE CENTER OF THE COMMUNITY. >> WELL AGAIN THIS IS OUR LOT OF ADOS TYPE OF IMAGES. WE HAVEN'T FILED THAT ADOS BUT BASED ON THE UNDERLYING PUD THERE NEEDS TO BE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF ACCOMPLICE TO WHAT WILL BE SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT. WHEN WE COME BACK TO YOU FOR ADOS, THEY WILL HAVE MORE IMAGES LIKE THIS IS THE WILL MAKE SURE THAT WERE HITTING THE COMPLIANCE STANDARD THAT WAS

REQUIRED. >> I THINK THEY LOOK AWESOME. THANK YOU.

>> WILL HE BE COMING UP TO SPEAK? >> MIKE, ALSO IN EDWARD ROSE.

TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE POOL, WE MUST BE BELOW 2000 FT.2 OTHERWISE WE HAVE TO HAVE ON STAFF LIFEGUARD. TYPICALLY, DEVELOPMENTS ARE BETWEEN 1500 AND 1800 FT.2 JUST

KIND OF GIVE YOU SOME REFERENCE. >> THAT WAS AWESOME. >> I WAS LOOKING UP THE CROSSWALK, I KNOW IT IS NOT NECESSARILY BUT JUST MENTION IT AND HAD QUESTION.

[00:45:05]

IF ANYONE KNOWS, I JUST LOOK IT UP. >> IT IS A SIGNALIZED CROSSWALK.

THERE ARE SOME OTHERS ALONG THE ROAD THAT'S WHY WE NEED IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SIGNALIZED RIGHT NOW. THERE'S NO WAY FOR PEDESTRIAN TO GET ACROSS THERE IF THEY WANTED TO.

>> AND OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OR DO WE HAVE A MOTION?

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.