[1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER]
[2. AGENDA APPROVAL]
[00:00:16]
>> I MOVE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. >> ALL IN FAVOR OF.
[3. MINUTES]
ITEM THREE, MINUTES. >> APPROVAL OF THE MEETING OF
THE JULY 1ST. >> ALL IN FAVOR.
[4. TABLED ITEMS]
AYE. MOTION CARRIES.TABLED ITEMS FOR REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES, IRON BRICK LLC. $500,242,345.
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING MODERNIZATION PROJECT.
>> I MOVE WE LIFT THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE.
[5. CONTRACTS]
ZACK JANSEN CFO AND CONTROLLER FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL.
THE CONTRACT FOR 5.2 MILLION IS WITH IRON BRICK LLC.
IRON BRICK IS THE LICENSED RESELLER FOR WORKDAY ON THE OMNIA COOPERATIVE CONTRACT. WE ARE TRYING TO OVERHAUL OUTDATED SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES. FOR EXAMPLE, OUR CURRENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM WAS IMPLEMENTED IN 1994.
IT HAS NOT HAD SERIOUS UPGRADES SINCE THEN.
WE HAVE THREE OTHERS THAT USE ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS BECAUSE OUR CURRENT ONE DOES NOT MEET THEIR NEEDS.
WE ALSO HAVE A PAYROLL CONTRACT THAT'S OVERPRICED DUE TO LACK OF NEGOTIATION OVER THE YEARS. SO WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE, 5.2 MILLION REPRESENTS ABOUT 2 MILLION FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND THEN ANOTHER 3.2 MILLION FOR THE ONGOING LICENSING WHICH RANGES FROM ABOUT 300,000 A YEAR TO 360,000 PER YEAR. THAT'S ABOUT 30,000 MORE THAN WE PAY FOR THESE FIVE OR SIX DIFFERENT CONTRACTS THAT WE HAVE TODAY. WE WILL HAVE THE BENEFIT OF A MODERN ERP SYSTEM THAT CONNECTS PAYROLL DATA, PURCHASING DATA, ACCOUNTING DATA. ALONG THE WAY WE'VE GOT SUPPORT FROM CITY COUNCIL WHICH INCLUDES THE CREATION OF AN ERP IMPLEMENTATION FUND WHERE THEY HAVE APPROPRIATED 2 MILLION FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION COSTS. THE REMAINING 3.2 MILLION WILL BE BUILT INTO ANNUAL BUDGETS GOING FORWARD.
THIS IS A 10-YEAR CONTRACT. I THINK WE'LL PROBABLY -- MY HOPE IS THIS IS A 20 YEAR SOLUTION AND WE ARE STARTING OFF WITH A 10-YEAR CONTRACT. LET ME ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.
>> OUT OF CURIOSITY IN READING THIS OVER, WHAT -- DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA AS TO WHAT ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY STAFFING COSTS?
>> YEAH, I HAVE A BUFFER BUILT INTO THIS BUDGET A LITTLE BIT OVER 110,000. IN TERMS OF TEMPORARY STAFFING COSTS WHAT I CAN SEE MAYBE OCCURRING IS ONE, WE'VE GOT VENDOR DATA THAT'S OLD AND HAS NOT BEEN PUT TOGETHER VERY WELL IN TERMS OF THERE WAS AN INVOICE TO PAY TEN YEARS AGO, SOMEBODY COULDN'T FIND THAT VENDOR. PUT IT INTO A SYSTEM.
THEY SPELLED THE NAME WRONG OR IT WAS SOMETHING WITH A "THE" AT THE BEGINNING AND IT GOT RE ENTERED INTO THE SYSTEM WITHOUT THE "THE" ON THE BEGINNING. WE LOOK AT VENDORS.
MAYBE CHANGE OF ADDRESS DIDN'T GET CAUGHT.
WE HAVE TO CLEAN UP OUR VENDOR FILES.
I'M NOT SURE IF WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO DO THAT INTERNALLY FOR EXAMPLE. THAT MIGHT BE AN EXAMPLE.
SAME THING WITH PAYROLL. WITH PAYROLL DATA WE MIGHT NEED SOME ASSISTANCE. I DON'T THINK WE ARE TALKING TOO MUCH. IN MY MIND IT WOULD BE MAYBE 20 OR 30,000 TO GET SOME TEMPORARY ACCOUNTANTS TO JOIN US FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS TO HELP US WITH THIS.
>> THESE WOULD ALL BE TEMPORARY FIXES, NOT ANYTHING LONG TERM.
>> CORRECT. >> YOUR DEPARTMENT DOING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS OR IS THAT SOMETHING OUTSIDE ALSO?
>> YEAH, A COUPLE OF DETAILS THERE.
ONE, THIS IS REALLY A JOINT EFFORT BETWEEN THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THE H.R. DEPARTMENT, AND THE IT DEPARTMENT.
WE'VE HIRED A PROJECT MANAGER AT I.T. TO HELP LEAD THIS BUT I AM THE OWNER OF THIS PROJECT. WHENEVER YOU'RE DOING A BIG IMPLEMENTATION LIKE THIS, YOU OFTEN NEED TO SELECT AN
[00:05:04]
IMPLEMENTATION PARTNER AND WE HAVE SELECTED WORKDAY TO BE THAT IMPLEMENTATION PARTNER AS WELL. THERE ARE OTHER VENDORS IN THIS SPACE THAT DO IMPLEMENTATION BUT WE'D LIKE THE ABILITY TO HOLD ONE PERSON ACCOUNTABLE AS OPPOSED TO IS IT A SYSTEM PROBLEM OR IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEM? WHO DO WE GO TO? ALMOST 1.9 MILLION IN THE BUDGET IN THIS CONTRACT IS FOR WORK DAYS HELP WITH THETHAT'S QUITE AN AMOUNT. >> IT WILL BE A SIGNIFICANT LIFT FOR THEM AS WELL AS US THIS NEXT YEAR TO PLAN AND IMPLEMENT.
>> ALONG THOSE LINES, IS THERE ANY ANTICIPATED THOUGHT OF IT, ANY ANTICIPATED CHANGE ORDERS THATMAY COME INTO THIS?
>> I DON'T THINK SO. AT LEAST AS WE'VE GOT THIS PUT TOGETHER RIGHT NOW. WHEN YOU'RE IMPLEMENTING A MODERN ERP THEY HAVE DIFFERENT MODULES.
WHAT MODULES OR COMPONENTS. WE ARE REPLACING OUR EXISTING PAYROLL SYSTEM. REPLACING OUR EXISTING ACCOUNTING SYSTEM, REPLACING OUR EXISTING PURCHASING SYSTEM WHICH IS FUNCTIONALLY A MICROSOFT ACCESS DATABASE THAT WAS BUILT A COUPLE OF DECADES AGO THAT DOESN'T TALK TO OUR ACCOUNING SYSTEM. PAPER PROCESS FROM ONE SYSTEM TO MAKE IT WORK. THERE ARE ALSO COMPONENTS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TODAY LIKE A HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT.
THE IDEA OF LET'S RUN A REPORT TO SEE WHAT POSITIONS WE HAVE ACROSS THE CITY. WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE WE DON'T TRACK POSITIONS. WE HAVE JOB TITLES.
BUT TO SAY HOW MANY VACANT SPOTS EXIST.
IN A DEPARTMENT OR TO SEE WHO IS IN SERGEY'S ROLE BEFORE HE HAD THAT POSITION. THERE IS NO TYPE OF ABILITY.
SO WE WILL HAVE THAT FOR THE FIRST TIME.
THERE ARE OTHER MODULES WE LOOKED AT THAT WE DIDN'T THINK WE NEEDED AT THIS TIME OR WEREN'T READY TO MAKE A DECISION ON. A CONTRACT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. BASICALLY CRADLE TO GRAVE.
RIGHT NOW THERE'S NOT A CENTRAL LOGGING OF CONTRACTS.
WE PUT THINGS OUT ON LASERFICHE BUT IN TERMS OF WHEN DOES THE CONTRACT EXPIRE, HOW DO WE ACTIVELY, PROACTIVELY TAKE IT OUT TO BID BEFORE IT EXPIRES AND MANAGE IT? WE DON'T HAVE THAT TYPE OF CAPABILITY.
THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING WE WOULD HAVE IN THE FUTURE BUT WE JUST WEREN'T READY TO MAKE ANY DECISIONS ABOUT THAT YET BECAUSE WE HADN'T VETTED ANY OTHER VENDORS IN THAT SPACE.
THAT MIGHT BE ONE DOWN THE ROAD. BUT I THINK IN TERMS OF THE CORE THINGS WE WERE FOCUSING ON, PAYROLL, HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM, I DON'T FORESEE ANY
CHANGE. >> I WOULD IMAGINE THAT UNTIL YOU REALLY GET IT IMPLEMENTED TALK ABOUT THE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED, YOU WON'T KNOW IF YOU NEED BETTER MODULES OR MORE MODULES UNTIL YOU SEE HOW IT'S RUNNING.
>> THERE'S ALSO SOMETHING TO BE SAID FOR HOW MUCH CHANGE CAN YOU REALLY MANAGE AT ONCE? I THINK FOR MOST CITY EMPLOYEES, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO SEE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE OTHER THAN HOW THEY ENTER -- WHEN THEY DO THEIR TIME SHEET, THEY WILL LOOK DIFFERENT. OTHERWISE IT'S THE ACCOUNTING STAFF IN MY DEPARTMENT AND OTHER DEPARTMENTS THAT WILL SEE A DIFFERENCE HERE. TRYING TO MANAGE TOO MUCH CHANGE AT ONCE CAN BE DISASTROUS. WE WANTED TO DO WHAT WE THOUGHT WE COULD EFFECTIVELY MANAGE AT THIS POINT IN TIME AND MAYBE DOWN THE ROAD WE MIGHT COME BACK AND ASK FOR MORE MODULES.
BUT THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS.
THIS IS 30 YEARS PAST DUE PROBABLY THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE
UPDATING OVER THE NEXT YEAR. >> THANKS.
APPRECIATE IT. >> NO ADDITIONAL MODELS WILL BE
EXTRA COST? >> IT WOULD BE MORE IF WE CHOSE
DIFFERENT MODULES. >> WHAT IS THE TIMELINE
IMPLEMENTATION? >> WE ARE LOOKING TO GO LIVE I WILL SAY EARLY NEXT SPRING. I'M INTENTIONALLY NOT SAYING A DATE BECAUSE I WANT TO HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY THERE.
I WILL SAY IF, FOR SOME REASON, WE ARE NOT READY TO GO LIVE BY JANUARY 1ST, 2028, THEN WE HAVE FAILED.
WE ARE TARGETING SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO THAT.
WE'VE GOT SOME BUFFER THERE IN CASE WE DO NEED TO SLOW DOWN ANY
[00:10:05]
>> ONE MORE CLARIFYING QUESTION. ALTHOUGH IT'S APPROVING 5,242,000 EXCEPT FOR IMPLEMENTATION FEE, THE MAJORITY OF THAT NUMBER WILL BE BUILT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
IT'S NOT A ONE TIME PAYMENT. >> I MOVE TO APPROVE.
>> I'LL SECOND. >> ALL IN FAVOR.
5A. REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $216,000 PHASE ONE ENERGY CENTER FEASIBILITY/DESIGN WORK ADDITIONAL SERVICES AMENDMENT.
>> THIS TIME I AM ZACHARY JACKSON CFO.
NOT ZAC JACKSON. I THINK PPW IS AWARE WE ARE UNDERGOING AN INITIATIVE TO PLACE THE ENERGY SECTOR CONSTRUCT AT THE SAME TIME THE PALLADIUM WAS.
IT'S CALLED THE ENERGY CENTER. THE PHYSICAL PLANT IS PROBABLY MORE ACCURATE. IT PROVIDES THE HEATED AND CHILLED WATER VIA UNDERGROUND LOOPS FOR THE HVAC SYSTEMS, CITY HALL, PALLADIUM, FIRE STATION 41.
HALF OF THE POLICE BUILDING AS WELL AS THE JAMES BUILDING.
MOST OF THAT WAS BROUGHT ONLINE ALMOST 20 YEARS AGO.
THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL CHILLER THAT WAS BROUGHT ONLINE IN 2017 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ICE RINK AND ALSO TO PROVIDE MORE CHILLED AIR TO CITY HALL AND OTHER BUILDINGS.
THOSE COMPONENTS ARE AT THE END OF THEIR USEFUL LIFE.
THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURERS IN A LOT OF INSTANCES DON'T EXIST ANYMORE. SO BUYING SPARE PARTS IS DIFFICULT. AND IN SOME INSTANCES YOU COULD SAY WE'VE REALLY ABUSED SOME OF THAT EQUIPMENT IN TERMS OF HOW HARD WE'VE USED IT SINCE IT'S BEEN BROUGHT ONLINE.
IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE EQUIPMENT AND THE SMALLEST FOOTPRINT POSSIBLE, ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE LOOKING AT IS GEOTHERMAL. THE GEOTHERMAL CAPABILITIES.
IN ORDER TO EXPLORE THAT, WE NEED TO DRILL TEST WELLS THERE AT THE SITE. AND SO THE CONTRACT HERE IS FOR THOSE TEST WELLS AS WELL AS SOME OTHER ENGINEERING RELATED TO THAT SO WE CAN TEST THE GEOTHERMAL CAPABILITIES AT THE ENERGY CENTER. IF THAT IS FEASIBLE, THE UP FRONT COSTS ARE PROBABLY A LITTLE HIGHER THAN MORE TRADITIONAL TYPE OF HVAC SOLUTIONS BUT THERE ARE FEDERAL CREDITS AVAILABLE THAT WOULD HELP US BUY DOWN THAT COST TO MAKE IT MORE COMPETITIVE TO OTHER TRADITIONAL ROUTES.
THERE ARE DEFINITELY COST SAVINGS IN OPERATIONS DOWN THE
ROAD IF WE CAN'T GO GEOTHERMAL. >> APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIES. REQUEST FOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARMEL AND VENDOR MARATHON HEALTH LLC.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO HEALTH SERVICES AGREEMENT.
>> GOOD MORNING. I AM JENNY, BENEFITS MANAGER HERE WITH THE CITY. THIS IS A CONTRACT FOR THE RENEWAL OF OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH MARATHON HEALTH TO HANDLE OUR
EMPLOYEE CLINIC. >> EXPANDED SERVICES, MORE
HOURS? >> WE DID ADD ADDITIONAL HOURS, YES. THIS TOTAL IS FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FEE. THAT HANDLES OUR CLINIC, NETWORK ANYWHERE, VIRTUAL CARE AND THE OTHER LOCAL CLINICS, WE PAY FOR THAT PARTNERSHIP AS WELL. THIS PARTNERSHIP FEE IS BROKEN
DOWN INTO 12 INSTALLMENTS. >> TELL ME THIS.
WE ARE LOOKING AT ALMOST A MILLION DOLLARS EXPENSE HERE.
IS EMPLOYEE UTILIZATION CHANGED THAT MUCH?
>> WE JUST WON AN AWARD WITH MARATHON, THE CITY OF CARMEL JUST WON AN ENGAGEMENT AWARD FOR HAVING SOME OF THE HIGHEST ENGAGEMENT IN THE NATION FOR THEIR EMPLOYEE CLINICS.
SO WE SEE A 75% ENGAGEMENT. WE SEE ABOUT 4000 VISITS A YEAR IN THIS AND THAT WOULD ALL BE GOING THROUGH OUR HEALTH PLAN WHICH WOULD BE A MUCH BIGGER IMPACT.
[00:15:04]
>> HAS INSURANCE COSTS CHANGED THAT MUCH?
>> YES. YES, WE ARE CONSTANTLY NEGOTIATING. WE WERE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE A ONE YEAR RATE HOLD SO THIS IS WHAT WE ARE CURRENTLY PAYING.
>> AND CLAIMS AS WELL. >> THE PARTNERSHIP, THIS DOES NOT RUN THROUGH INSURANCE. THE POINT OF MARATHON HEALTH IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO RUN THESE THROUGH INSURANCE.
WE CAN BUDGET. WE PAY THIS PARTNERSHIP FEE WHETHER WE SEE 1% IN A YEAR OR 4000 PEOPLE IN A YEAR.
>> MOVE WE APPROVE. >> ILL SECOND.
ITEM C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES CROSS ROAD ENGINEERS PC $150,416.90.
RANGE LINE ROAD ON STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS, INSPECTION
FEES, ADDITIONAL SERVICES TH. >> GOOD MORNING, CRYSTAL WITH THE STREET DEPARTMENT. THIS CONTRACT WITH CROSSROADS IS TO EXPAND THEIR INSPECTIONS FOR THE RANGE LINE STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. THEY EXECUTED CONTRACT WITH CALUMET SHOULD BEGIN AT THE BEGINNING OF AUGUST.
THEIR WORK BEFORE THE WINTER SO WE HAVE ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR THE MARKET. FOR THIS CONTRACT SPECIFICALLY WE HAVE EXPANDED WHAT THEIR INSPECTIONS WILL BE.
>> QUESTIONS OR MOTION? >> I MOVE WE APPROVE.
[6. REQUEST TO USE CITY STREETS/PROPERTY]
MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 6 REQUEST TO USE CITY STREETS AND PROPERTY. 6A.
REQUEST TO USE/CLOSED CITY STREETS GHOSTS N GOBLINS 5K/2 K. OCTOBER 24, 2026. RAIN DATE OCTOBER 31ST, 2026.
5:00 A.M. TO 12:00 P.M. I THINK WHAT WE WILL DO IS COME ALL THE REQUESTS FOR USE OF CITY AND STREETS WE CAN TAKE IT ONCE UNLESS SOMEONE HAS TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THESE INDIVIDUALLY.
THEY ARE ALL APPROVED BY DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS.
>> I MOVE WE APPROVE ITEM 6A THROUGH B.
[7. OTHER]
OTHER. REQUEST FOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLAY TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON COUNTY INDIANA, CARMEL FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF CARMEL.JOHN W. HENSEL GOVERNMENT CENTER AND DOUGLAS CALLAHAN FIRE
STATION. >> WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON WHAT WE ARE DOING BUT I WANTED TO GIVE YOU THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THIS SO YOU WILL SEE THAT I SUBMITTED A RESOLUTION.
I APOLOGIZE I WAS A LITTLE BIT LATE.
THE RESOLUTION IS WHAT YOU ARE USING AS AN INSTRUMENT TO IMPROVE THE LEASE. IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME RESOLUTION THE TOWNSHIP DEVELOPED AT THEIR MEETING A COUPLE DAYS LATER. THE LEASE IS ESSENTIALLY A NO RENT LEASE THAT ESTABLISHES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES THAT'S EXISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
IT'S JUST NEVER BEEN RECORDED IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM.
BUT THE BUILDING IS OWNED BY THE TOWNSHIP BUT IT'S UTILIZED FOR THE CITY FOR MULTIPLE PURPOSES ACTUALLY INCLUDING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS THE ONT DEPARTMENT.
THAT LEASE FORMALIZES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LANDLORD
AND TENANT, IF YOU WILL. >> THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE THE LATE '90S WHEN WE STARTED TO USE THE BUILDING.
ESSENTIALLY THIS IS FORMALIZING THAT AGREEMENT.
IT'S PUTTING IT IN WRITING. >> DO WE NEED TO TAKE B FIRST?
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH ORDER? >> ACTUALLY B IS A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION. THE FIRST ONE INCLUDES A RESOLUTION AS A VEHICLE TO APPROVE THE LEASE ITSELF.
>> QUESTIONS? >> I JUST WANT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO THIS, AS FAR AS THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ARE CONCERNED OR PROVISIONS, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY WOULD EVEN BE DETERMINING THIS. IS IT THE CITY OR THE TOWNSHIP'S
RESPONSIBILITY? >> WE DO HAVE SOME RESPONSIBILITY AS FAR AS UTILITIES GO PUBLIC UTILITIES
[00:20:03]
ARE SPLIT BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP AND FIRE DEPARTMENT THEY'RE ESSENTIALLY THE TOWNSHIP PAYS A PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THAT BUILDING, PART OF IT IS THE FIRE STATION AND PART OF IT IS THE TOWNSHIP BUILDING SO THERE'S A PERCENTAGE OF UTILITIES THAT WE PAY. IT COVERS OUR PORTION.WE ALSO DO TRASH SERVICE AS WELL.
BUT THERE IS NO LEASE TO ACTUALLY USE THE SPACE.
>> IN OTHER WORDS, IT'S BASICALLY THE TOWNSHIP'S RESPONSIBILITY EXCEPT FOR THE FIRE, THE ACTUAL FIRE STATION, IT'S THE TOWNSHIP'S RESPONSIBILITY PREDOMINANTLY TO
>> REIMREIMBURSABLE. AND THEN DEPENDING ON THE PERCENTAGE OF USE BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAMP THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REIMBURSES THE TOWNSHIP FOR
THOSE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES. >> THANKS.
>> MOTION. >> MOVE TO APPROVE.
7B. RESOLUTION BPW07-15-26-01, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE CITY OF CARMEL. REQUEST FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDING THE CITY OF CARMEL SPECIAL EVENT FACILITY USE
POLICY. >> THIS IS MORE OF A HOUSECLEANING ITEM. WE UPDATE OUR USE AND FACILITY POLICY EVERY SO OFTEN. THIS ONE HAS A COUPLE OF TWEAKS ON INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. WE HAVE BEEN REALIZING THAT EVERY EVENT AND EVERY VENDOR IS VERY DIFFERENT.
THEY CARRY DIFFERENT TYPES OF INSURANCE.
WE'VE HAD AN APPROACH REQUESTING PERHAPS TOO MUCH DEPENDING ON THE EVENTS. THIS POLICY ADJUSTS THOSE LIMITS AND THERE'S A COUPLE OTHER CLEANUP ITEMS AS WELL.
>> QUESTIONS? >> MOVE TO APPROVE.
REQUEST FOR DORA DESIGNATION: SALT.
>> I THINK YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THOSE AT THIS POINT.
IT'S ANOTHER RESTAURANT, SALT. I BELIEVE IT'S IN THE CITY CENTER. THEY ARE WITHIN DORA.
OUTDOOR DISTRICT WHERE THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE A DESIGNATED PERMITTEE. THEY HAVE SATISFIED ALL REQUIREMENTS. IT'S BEEN APPROVED BY
DEPARTMENTS. >> MOVE TO APPROVE.
ITEMS D, E, F, G, H HAVE ALL BEEN APPROVED.
WE HAVE SOMEONE TO SPEAK. HELLO.
>> SORRY. ELEANOR PRESCOTT, ENGINEERING.
GOOD MORNING BOARD. WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR
ITEM 7D THROUGH H. >> ANY QUESTIONS.
>> WE APPROVE ITEM 7D THROUGH >> I'LL SECOND.
>> MOTION CARRIES.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.