[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[2. AGENDA APPROVAL]
[3. INVOCATION]
[4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]
[6. RECOGNITION OF PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL]
[00:06:53]
OUT THE CODE FOR MORAL VIRTUE IT REQUIRES INDIVIDUALS TO BE ABLE TO EXERCISE FREE POWER OF
[00:07:00]
CHOICE WITHOUT THE INTERVENTION OF ANY ELEMENTAL FORCE. COURSE VACCINATION TO CONSIDER WHETHER THEY MIGHT BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AND LOSS OF LIFE THAN -- POLICIES.GARCINIA WENT TO GET AN EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE IS UNCONSCIONABLE ESPECIALLY GIVEN ITS ASSOCIATED WITH NOTABLE SIDE EFFECTS OVER 4000 DEATHS, SO FAR AND COUNTING RAISES RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS VIOLATES MEDICAL FREEDOM AND INFORMED CONSENT AND ONLY REDUCES THE ABSOLUTE RISK OF COVID BY MAXIMUM OF 1.3 PERCENT. NOT THE 67 TO 95 PERCENT AS HAS BEEN WIDELY REPORTED WHICH IS ONLY THE RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION.
THOSE FIGURES DO NOT ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE VACCINE'S EFFECTIVENESS.
EVEN ONES WHO ADOPT THIS TOO MANY. HOW MANY SIDE EFFECTS AND DEATHS FROM THE VACCINE SHOULD WE BE OKAY WITH? FOR DISEASES HAS A GREATER THAN 98 PERCENT SURVIVAL RATE AND PRODUCES LONG-LASTING IMMUNITY AS SHOWN BY RECENT STUDY AND HAS A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE TREATMENT THAT COSTS SHOWN IN ANOTHER RECENT STUDIES WERE REDUCED COVID CASES BY 97 PERCENT. CURRENT POLICIES FORCE ON DESIGNATED PEOPLE TO BE ROUTINELY TESTED AND WERE MASKS.
THE PCR TEST IS A PROCESS OF AMPLIFICATION WASN'T DESIGNED TO BE A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL.
IF ENOUGH CYCLES AROUND FALSE POSITIVES ARE HIGHLY PROBABLE AS REPORTED IN THE NEW YORK TIMES. ANY TEST WITH THE THRESHOLD ABOVE 35 IS TOO SENSITIVE.
CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS BUT THOSE WHO ARE UNVACCINATED HAVE 40 CYCLES RUN VERSUS ONLY 27 FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN VACCINATED. THAT SETS THE STAGE FOR FALSE POSITIVE EXPERT COVID VACCINES DON'T KEEP PEOPLE FROM GETTING COVID BUT MIGHT MINIMIZE SYMPTOMS WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL IS INFECTED. SYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE CAN SPREAD COVID WE SYMPTOMATIC INFECTION IS NOT CLINICALLY PROVEN TO SPREAD DISEASE ACCORDING TO STUDIES ON THE CDC'S OWN WEBSITE. THE EMAILS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS. SYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE SPREAD COVID, VACCINATED OR NOT. MANDATING DIFFERENT TREATMENT FOR UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUALS IS NOT BASED ON CURRENT SCIENCE AND IS ILLEGAL. PLEASE RESTORE THE RIGHT AND
[7. COUNCIL AND MAYORAL COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS]
THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE. THANK YOU.> THANK YOU. COUNSEL COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS. COUNSEL NELSON HAS A PROCLAMATION.>> GOOD EVENING. CARMEL PRIDES ITSELF IN BEING AN INCLUSIVE CITY WHERE ONE CAN BUILD A HOME, RAISE A FAMILY AND FIND ASSORTED MEANINGFUL CAREER.
AS A CANDIDATE I RAN WITH THE PROMISE TO ENSURE ALL WERE MADE TO FEEL INCLUDED AND HEARD.
AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL, I WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE THESE FOUNDATIONAL 10 INCH AND SUPPORT THE MAYOR'S EFFORTS TO BUILD A CITY WHERE EVERYONE, REGARDLESS OF THE RACE,
[00:10:03]
RELIGION, SEXUAL ORIENTATION FEELS INCLUDED, SAFE, AND WELCOME AND WITH THAT I WOULD LIKE TO READ THE OFFICIAL PROCLAMATION FROM THE CITY OF CARMEL.WHEREAS SINCE THE EARLIEST DAYS OF OUR REPUBLIC, WE HAVE STRIVED TO REALIZE THE IDEALS OF FREEDOM EXPRESSED IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND OUR CONSTITUTION AND WHEREAS AMERICA'S DIVERSITY IS ONE OF OUR GREATEST STRENGTHS AND WHEREAS CARMEL IS A COMMUNITY THAT ASPIRES TO BE A PLACE THAT ALLOWS EVERYONE TO THRIVE, PROSPER, AND ENJOY THE HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE AND WHEREAS CARMEL IS A PLACE OF TOLERANCE, UNDERSTANDING, AND MUTUAL RESPECT AND WHEREAS CARMEL HAS AN LGBT COMMUNITY THAT INCLUDES PEOPLE OF ALL ETHNICITIES, RELIGIONS, AND PROFESSIONS AND WHEREAS JUNE WAS FIRST PROCLAIMED LGBT PRIDE MONTH NATIONWIDE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1999 AND WHEREAS ALL PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO LIVE WITHOUT FEAR OF PREJUDICE, DISCRIMINATION, VIOLENCE, AND HATRED BASED ON RACE, RELIGION, GENDER IDENTITY OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION, NOW THEREFORE I COMMENT JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2021 AS LGBT PRIDE MONTH IN THE CITY OF CARMEL INDIANA IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED MY NAME AND CAUSE THE CITY OF CARMEL TO BE AFFIXED. THE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE IS RIGHT HERE FOLLOWED BY SUE WOLF GAME, THE CITY CLERK. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS? MOVING ON.
[8. CONSENT AGENDA]
NUMBER EIGHT, CONSENT AGENDA. APA APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MAY 17, 2021, REGULAR MEETING.B, CLAIMS. ONE, PAYROLL 2,000,500 $500,513.01.
GENERAL CLAIMS. $3,094,571.71 AND THREE, RETIREMENT.
$97,767.27. >> SECOND. >> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. MOVING ONTO MY NUMB. WE HAVE NONE.
[10. COMMITTEE REPORTS]
10 COMMITTEE REPORTS, FINANCE UTILITIES. COUNSELOR?>> THANK YOU. WE DID MEET ON 5/25/21 AND WE DEALT WITH FIVE ISSUES THAT WERE SENT TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. A REPORT ON FOUR OF THOSE AS WE HANDLE THEM ON OUR AGENDA.HE FIFTH ISSUE WE DEALT WITH IS THE ORDINANCE D 2563 Ã21 AND THAT IS WHERE THAT WAS A PROPOSED IN THE AMOUNT OF $8 MILLION WAS PROPOSED AND WE HEARD -- AS WE ALL KNOW WE WERE HOLDING THAT BECAUSE WE WERE WAITING TO GET INFORMATION REGARDING A NEEDED PARKING GARAGE FOR THE POLICE STATION AND THE DIRECTOR DID A REPORT ON THAT AND THE AVERAGE QUOTE WAS 9.7 MILLION TO BUILD THE GARAGE WITH A NUMBER OF SPACES AND AN ADDITIONAL FLOOR AND WHAT WE BELIEVED WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THAT AREA.
SO WE THEN WENT AND WORKED ON THE AMOUNT THAT THE BOND WOULD BE WOULD BE FOR AND WE RECEIVED THAT INFORMATION BACK FROM THIS A.M. SPA FROM BAKER TILLY AND THE AMOUNT THAT WE ARE GOING TO RECOMMEND BACK TO THE COUNCIL IS 11.5 MILLION AND THAT WILL GIVE US THE NET OF 9.7 MILLION AND THAT WOULD BE USED TO BUILD A POLICE STATION PARKING GARAGE.
THE AMENDED ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN SENT TO ALL CITY COUNSELORS, AND THIS ORDINANCE COMES BACK TO YOU AS AMENDED WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION 30.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? >> THANK YOU, ACTING PRESIDENT.
I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ON THE PARKING GARAGE. DO WE WANT TO WAIT TO UNTIL WE
[00:15:12]
GO THROUGH THE ORDINANCE WILL DO THAT NOW? >> WE WON'T DO THAT NOW.
THIS WILL BE COMING BACK IN THE NEXT MEETING BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN INFORMED WE HAVE TO DO A PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL PROBABLY BE DEALING WITH AT THE SECOND MEETNG.
>> DO YOU WANT ME TO ASK QUESTIONS NOW? >> LET'S DELAY IT.AND-USE
[11. OTHER REPORTS]
AND SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE HAS NOT MET. 11.REPORT BEAUTY I WILL QUICKLY REVIEW THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE LAST MONTH.
AS FAR AS FINANCES, WE FINISHED THE MONTH OF APRIL WITH $3.1 MILLION OF UNRESTRICTED FUNDS AND ALTOGETHER OVER $10 MILLION OF FUNDS IN THE BANK. I HAVE A SHIRT TODAY WITH REPRESENTING AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE THAT WILL BE TAKING PLACE AT THE HOTEL CARMICHAEL AND THE PALLADIUM THIS ENTIRE WEEK CALLED THE INTERNATIONAL MAKING CITIES LIVABLE CONFERENCE.HIS CONFERENCE TAKES PLACE IN CITIES LIKE ROME AND OTTAWA AND PORTLAND ACROSS THE GLOBE AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME EVER AND ITS MULTI-DECADE HISTORY THAT IS TAKING PLACE IN A SUBURB TO HIGHLIGHT THE AMAZING DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN OUR GREAT CITY WE ARE INDUSTRIOUS ON THE FIRST FLOOR. THE KENT IS ALMOST READY TO BE OPENED.F YOU SPEND BY LATELY, IT'S FAIRLY FINISHED. THEY ARE JUST DOING THE POOL IN THE BACK. THE PROSCENIUM, A WONDERFUL PROJECT BY THE NOVA DEVELOPMENT GROUP CONTINUES POSTING AHEAD. I HOPE YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO CHECK OUT ONE OF THE BUILDINGS.
THIS HELD A GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY JUST LAST MONTH AND THAT IS AND ALL OWNER OCCUPIED FOR SALE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT JUST NORTH OF CITY HALL WITH TOWNHOMES AND CONDOS.
THAT HAS BEGUN CONSTRUCTION LOT ONE ON THE PNC SITE WE -- WILL SEE SOMETHING HAPPENING IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AND MATT'S PROJECT IS CLOSE TO STARTING. MAGNOLIA RECEIVED THE OWNER-OCCUPIED SECTION AND THE CONDESCENSION OF MINIMALLY HAS RECEIVED ALL OF THE CITY APPROVALS AND VARIANCES AND THEY SHOULD START CONSTRUCTION IMMINENTLY.
WE HAVE UPDATED RENDERINGS FINALLY.SORRY THAT'S TAKEN ME SO LONG.
THE CORNER CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHOULD START MOVING EARTHWORK, I BELIEVE, THIS MONTH.
THAT'S GOING TO BE A REAL ATTRACTIVE PRESENCE ON OUR 1/16 AND GREENLAND/WESTFIELD INTERSECTION FRANCISCAN ORTHOPEDIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE CONTINUES ITS CONSTRUCTION AS WELL AS THIS WONDERFUL UPDATED PICTURE ENZO TECH THAT I FINALLY UPDATED.
BROOKSHIRE VILLAGE SHOPS. THEY SHOULD BE RUNNING. LATE JULY AND THERE WAS ACTUALLY A TOUR OF THAT SPACE EARLIER TODAY. I KNOW THE NEIGHBORS ARE EXCITED TO HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROCERY STORE BACK.ND WITH THAT I'M HAPPY
TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> COUNSEL ANY QUESTIONS THANK YOU, SIR.
[12. OLD BUSINESS]
MOVING ON. OLD BUSINESS.INSTRUCTED TO TABLE THIS FOR THE NEXT MEETING. WE WILL DO A PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:20:04]
>> MR. PRESIDENT, I MOVED TO TABLE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
>> SECOND. >> WITHOUT OBJECTION. >> TABLE.
>> ORDINANCE D 25 6520 THE CITY OF CARMEL INDIANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 4 SECTION 2 Ã 107 OF THESE SPONSORS ARE TAXES CONCERNING FINANCE UTILITIES RULES COMMITTEE.
C THE REGION OF THE ORDINANCE D. AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS TO SUPPORT THE SIGNATURE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE APPROVING OTHER ACTIONS AND RESPECT THERETO. SPONSORS ARE -- THIS IS RETURNING FROM THE FINANCIAL
RULES COMMITTEE. >> THE NEXT FOUR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, THE FINANCE COMMITTEE DEALT WITH THESE ARE TO DISCUSS THE BONDS THAT WOULD BE USED TO DEVELOP FOR BACK BONDS WHICH MEANS NO RISK TO THE TAXPAYER BUT WOULD BE USING TIF FOR THESE PROJECTS AND GRADING ALLOCATION AREAS. I WILL MOVE THROUGH THEM QUICKLY.
WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THEM SO 2579 IS FOR $60 MILLION BOND FOR THE SIGNATURE PROJECT THAT
RETURNS BACK WITH THE POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION 30. >> ANY QUESTIONS?
>> THIS IS FOR THE DIRECTOR ON THIS PARTICULAR TIF BOND. ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE WHAT IS
THE SPLIT BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY? >> IS A 90/10 SPLIT AND ALONG WITH THAT ONE OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPER'S HALF THE LAND FOR
OUR FUTURE STREET THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. >> AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE DEVELOP OR PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY IT WAS NOT PURCHASED BY THE CITY.
>> THAT'S CORRECT AND WE ALSO HAVE CLAY SHEETS AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEVELOPER
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS WITH THEM AS WELL. >> THANK YOU.
>> I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. > MOVED TO APPROVE. >> SECOND.
>> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. AND THAT WOULD BE 6-0 PAST.
GOOD LUCK. D RESOLUTION. THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, APPROVING GENERAL MATTERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OLD MERIDIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA. THIS IS RETURNING FROM FINANCE,
UTILITIES COMMITTEE. >> THIS WILL CREATE THE ALLOCATION AREA AND GRADING AREA FOR THE TIF. THIS COMES BACK TO COUNSELWITH A 3-0 RECOMMENDATION.
SAME PROJECT. THE SIGNATURE PROJECT. >> AND A NECESSARY PORTION TO
MAKE IT CONTINUE. >> ANY DISCUSSION? MOTION?
>> MOVES.>> MOVED TO APPROVE. >> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. 6-0. MOVING ON.
E THE READING OF ORDINANCE D-2580-21. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS TO SUPPORT THE PROSCENIUM TWO PROJECT, AND
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING OTHER ACTIONS IN RESPECT THERETO. >> CONTINUING THE THEME, ALTHOUGH I MIGHT JUST MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC UNDERSTAND THAT THE NIGHT THAT THESE TWO WERE INTRODUCED, IT WAS INTRODUCING $105 MILLION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT IN CARMEL.
IT WAS A RATHER REMARKABLE EVENING AND SOMETHING I WANT TO MAKE SURE DOES NOT GO UNNOTICED OR NOT COMMENTED ON. BUT IN THIS CASE, THIS ONE IS A $5 MILLION BOND.
THIS IS FOR THE PROSCENIUM TWO PROJECT WHICH WILL BE ACROSS THE STREET FROM PROSCENIUM ONE ON RANGE LINE ROAD FROM THIS COMES BACK WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION 350.> SO WHAT IS THE TIF SPLIT AND WAS THE LAND PURCHASE BY THE DEVELOPER OR GIFTED?
>> THIS IS A 100 PERCENT TIF PROJECT MUCH LIKE THE ORIGINAL PROSCENIUM SO THIS IS AN
[00:25:01]
EXTENSION OF THAT PROJECT AND THE DEVELOPER PURCHASED THE LAND AND WE HAVE TONY IN THE OFFICE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ASK HIM QUESTIONS. THIS IS A REALLY EXCITING PROJECT AND IT'S NICE TO SEE THIS DEVELOPMENT JUMP ACROSS THE RANGE LINE AS WE CONTINUETO BUILD OUT THE CENTRAL CORE. >> SO WHEN THE PROSCENIUM CHEW, IF I REMEMBER IT WAS $49,000. CORRECT? AND THE ADDITIONAL TIF, ONCE COMPLETED WILL BE $195,000 IN THE SCHOOL REFERENDUM TAXES WILL GET $29,000.
>> THAT IS CORRECT. >> AND AGAIN, MAKING SURE EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. THIS PROJECT MAKES WAY FOR THE POLICE STATION PROJECT WHICH WE VOTED ON TWO MEETINGS AGO IN ORDER TO MAKE WAY FOR THAT. SO HUNTINGTON BANK HAS BEEN SOLD AND EVERYTHING MOVES AROUND. WITH THAT I WOULD MAKE A MOTION
TO APPROVE. >> SO MOVED. >> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. 6-0. MOVING ON LETTER AFTER RESOLUTION CC Ã05 Ã03 Ã21 Ã 02. A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA APPROVING CERTAIN MATTERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
INTEGRATED 126 STREET QUARTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA. >> THIS IS THEN CREATING THE ALLOCATION AREA FOR THE TIF AND IT IS REGARDING THE PROSCENIUM TWO PROJECT.
>> ANY QUESTIONS? >> I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE. >> SECOND.
>> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. 6-0.
THANK YOU. 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE Z Ã
[13. PUBLIC HEARINGS]
667 Ã21. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL INDIANA ESTABLISHING THE BEDFORD FALLS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.>> MITCH INTRODUCED. >> SECOND. >> COUNSELOR CAMPBELL.> THIS ORDINANCE ESTABLISHES THE BEDFORD FALLS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE.
THE BEDFORD FALLS PUD. THIS ORDINANCE WOULD REZONE THE REAL ESTATE FROM OUR THREE RESIDENTIAL AND S1 RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ALLOWING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD LAID OUT IN A STYLE AND CHARACTER AS DEPICTED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN IN THE PACKET WHICH INCLUDES SINGLE-FAMILY.
>> GOOD EVENING. I AM STEVE HARDEN AND PLEASED TO BE REPRESENTING LESS IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FROM LESS IMPACT WE HAVE SCOTT AND STAN HERE LONG TIME FAMILY AND DEVELOPERS HERE IN CARMEL. MOST RECENTLY CUSTOM DEVELOPMENT.
WE HAVE BEEN FROM THE BEGINNING WORKING CLOSELY WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF HERE IN CARMEL AND I WILL SHOW YOU IN THE AREA OF THE LOCATION.
THIS IS A LITTLE UNDER 17 ACRES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE. WESTCHASE NEIGHBORHOOD IS TO THE IMMEDIATE WEST.INGS ROAD IS TO THE SOUTH. IN THE BEGINNING IT ENDS UP CLOSE TO THIS PROPERTY. WE ARE PLANNING TO CONNECT HIM SCOTT REPLIED IT'S UP TO YOU IF YOU WANT US TO CONNECT WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO. WE ARE ALL ABOUT TRAILS AND CONNECTIVITY SO WE LET THEM DECIDE AND THEN CAME BACK DURING THE PROCESS AND SAID THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT CONNECTED SO WE'VE INCLUDED IN THE PUD ORDINANCE THAT WILL BE CONCLUDED THAT THE DEVELOPER'S COST.
THEY THEN SUPPORTED A LETTER OF SUPPORT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WE DIDN'T EVEN ASK THEM TO DO IT. WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF THAT AND I THINK THAT WAS REALLY INDICATIVE OF SCOTT, PARTICULARLY, HIS EFFORTS WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORS.E BARTERED A LARGER MEETING ANYONE THAT WANTED TO WALK THE PROPERTY LINE OR HAVE ANY SPECIFIC ISSUES OR QUESTIONS. MOST PEOPLE WE FOUND BEAUTY FROM THEIR FRONT AND BACK PORCH
[00:30:02]
AND ONCE AGAIN SCOTT WALKED SEVERAL OF THE PROPERTIES WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND WE LEARN DIFFERENT THINGS AT SOME POINT SHE WILL WANT TO KEEP AN OLD FARM FENCE AND SOMETIMES THEY WANT IT REMOVED IMMEDIATELY WE FOUND MOST OF THE PEOPLE WANTED TO SEE THE OLD FENCE REMOVED SO YOU WILL SEE LANGUAGE FOR THAT AS WELL. AS I WENT THROUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROCESS WE WENT TO THE COMMITTEE, THEN WE RECEIVED A FAVORABLE ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL STAFF SUPPORT TO THE PROCESS. THE REQUIREMENT WE HAVE INTERNAL SIDEWALKS AND A PERIMETER TRAIL AND WE HAVE AN EIGHT FOOT TRAIL THAT WRAPS AROUND THROUGH THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. WE INCORPORATED TREE PRESERVATION LANGUAGE. AS I MENTIONED BEFORE THERE'S A PROVISION FOR REMOVING THE FARM FENCE. IT WAS REQUESTED THAT SIX FOOT TRAIL ON THE PERIMETER FINALLY AT THE LAST COMMISSION THERE WERE NO NEIGHBORS DEMONSTRATING WE RECEIVED THE UNANIMOUS FAVOR RECOMMENDATION THAT'S BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING AND WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.JUST TO BE CLEAR TOO, THIS IS AN AGE-RESTRICTED NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT WAS THE DEVELOPER'S PLAN FROM THE BEGINNING. IT WAS REQUESTED TO DO IT THAT WAY.
THAT'S WHAT THEIR VISION IS. WE ARE EXCITED TO BE IN THE PROJECT AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU HAVE TONIGHT. >> WOULD YOU ALSO TOUCH ON THE IDEA THAT YOU CAN ADAPT THIS
HOUSE WOULD YOU TOUCH ON THAT REALLY QUICK? >> THESE HOMES WILL HAVE EASY ACCESS IN AND OUT AND WE WILL HAVE SHOWERS THAT ARE BLOCKED SO IF YOU EVENTUALLY AGE IN PLACE AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE GRAB BARS, AND WE WILL HAVE THAT.
SCOTT IS HERE AND CORRECT ME IF I DON'T SEE ANY OF THIS CORRECTLY BUT THEY WILL HAVE ALWAYS WIDE ENOUGH FOR WHEELCHAIR. ARE YOU GOING TO BE FOLLOWING A UNIVERSAL DESIGN. UNIVERSAL DESIGN TECHNIQUE OUT THERE THAT PEOPLE ARE DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS ARE DOING?> SCOTT ANSWERED THIS -- SCOTT WILL SAY YES.
THEY WILL BE SEEKING MOST OF THOSE TYPES OF UNIVERSAL DESIGNS, SO THAT IS A
PROVISION. >> SO THAT IS A VERY NICE THING THAT MUST -- SOME PEOPLE MUST NOT BE AWARE OF. SO KUDOS TO YOU FOR THAT. AND THEN IS THIS GOING TO BE MY YARD IS MOWED AND MY SNOW IS PLOWED BY THE HOA? VERY GOOD.
>> I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR BRINGING MORE EMPTY NESTOR HOUSING.
I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE IN MY DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY WHO HAVE FIVE BEDROOM HOMES AND ALL THE KIDS ARE GROWN UP AND THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH OPTIONS OF PLACES TO DOWNSIZE.HIS IS A HIGH-QUALITY OPTION. I LIKE THE AMENITIES AND I HOPE TO SEE MORE PROJECTS LIKE THIS
IN CARMEL. >> THANK YOU. I AGREE WITH WHAT COUNSELOR ASSELIN SAID AND I APPRECIATE THE -- WENT TO THE NEIGHBORS DISCUSSING IT WITH ME THIS IS IN THE NORTH DISTRICT AND WE CAN'T GET ENOUGH OF THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT SO I'M REAL HAPPY TO SEE ON THE WEST SIDE. NOT EVERYONE WANTS TO GO TOWARDS MIDTOWN. HAVE A QUESTION.T SOME POINT IN THE PROCESS SOMEBODY ASKED IF BICYCLES WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE
TRAILS. >> DURING THE COMMITTEE PROCESS, WE HAD PROPOSED REALLY WANTED TO HAVE THE TRAILS THAT WENT ALONG THE PERIMETER IN THE BACKYARDS BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND BACK HERE WE WANTED THOSE TO BE SIX FOOT WIDE.
WE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT 10 FOOT WIDE BICYCLE TRAILS BECAUSE IT'S INTENDED TO BE A WALKING TRAIL. THERE WAS A REQUEST ABOUT YOU COULD HAVE WALKING PASSAGES OF
TWO. >> I THINK IT'S A GREAT PRODUCT AND DON'T HAVE ANY
COMPLAINTS. >> THANK YOU. >> TWO QUESTIONS.
ONE PRICE POINT AND WHAT DO YOU FIND IS AGE RESTRICTED? >> THE SECOND QUESTION IS
[00:35:05]
UNDER THE FEDERAL LAW YOU HAVE TO HAVE ONE PERSON AGE 55 OR OVER SO WE HAVE TO BE COMPLIANT AND THE AVERAGE PRICE WILL BE $475,000 WITH A RANGE BELOW THAT.>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE I SEND THIS TO LAND USE? I WILL SAY AS YOUR REPRESENTATIVE IF I WERE TO MAKE A BLUEPRINT FOR AN EMPTY NESTOR COMMUNITY TO BE PUT ON THE WEST SIDE, WHICH IS A PLACE WE HAVE LAND TO DO IT, THIS WOULD BE IT.
HE DID A GREAT JOB. WE WILL SEE A COMMITTEE. >> AND I LOVE THE NAME.
IS THERE A MR. POTTER INVOLVED? >> MR. POTTER OBJECTED TO IT. >> FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE Z66821. REZONING REAL ESTATE TO SO LARA PUD DISTRICT AND AMENDING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE.> MOVED TO INTRODUCE.
>> SECOND. >> OKAY. THIS ORDINANCE RE-ZONES --
OKAY. >> GOOD POINT PART QUICKLY. PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE Z667/21. WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:36 AND 50 SECONDS.
ANY WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST, COME RUSHING FORWARD.
NOT ALL AT ONCE. I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
THANK YOU. >> THIS ORDINANCE RE-ZONES .50 FROM S-ONE RESIDENTIAL TO THE PUD DISTRICT AND AMENDS THE EXISTING PUD DISTRICT ORDINANCE BY ADDING THAT .50 ACRE INTO THE DISTRICT AND MODIFYING THE EXHIBITS TO DEPICT THE INCLUSION OF THE REAL ESTATE.
SAID ACREAGE IS LOCATED GENERALLY ADJACENT TO THE NORTHERN EDGE OF NORTH VAIL AT
JACKSON'S GRANT. >> GIVE US YOUR NAME AND RESIDENCE.OT YOUR ADDRESS.
>> I AM WELL TURNER. I LIVE IN CARMEL. I AM ALSO SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF 3/24. AND SO WHAT WE HAVE DONE OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS IS ACQUIRED THIS HALF ACRE PARCEL AND THROUGH THE PROCESS WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO ASSESS INTO THE JACKSON'S GRANT PUD AND THEN SPLIT IT UP AS THE LINE IS DRAWN HERE.
THIS PORTION WILL GO TO 3-25. IN DOING THAT WE HAVE MAINTAINED A TREE PRESERVATION AREA AND ADDED ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS AT THE REQUEST OF THE SELLER OF THE PARCEL.
SO I THINK WHAT WE ARE ASKING IS TO REZONE THE PARCEL AND ALSO TO INCLUDE IT IN THE PUD.
NOBODY WAS HARMED. THE SELLER AND THE TWO BUYERS. IT HARMS NOBODY BUT IT MAKES
THOSE LOTS WHOLE IS BASICALLY WHAT IT DOES. >> SO IN ORDER TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND ACT ON THIS, I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM STAFF. WAS THERE ANY -- WAS THERE PROPER NOTICE? IS THERE ANY REASON THIS SHOULD GO TO COMMITTEE?
>> DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. PEOPLE THAT CAME TO THE MEETING
[00:40:01]
IN THE PLAN COMMISSION. I HAD ADDITIONAL REQUESTS ABOUT LANDSCAPING ABOUT THE WESTERN PROPERTY AND IT WAS EXPLAINED -- THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING THAT WAS ADDED ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OR JUST A PRIVATE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BUYERS AND THE SELLERS OF THAT PARCEL. AND I DIDN'T SEE ANY REASON WHY SHOULDN'T SUSPEND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE. DOES THE COMING HOA, I DON'T THINK THEY TOTALLY TAKEN OVER BUT DO THEY HAVE ANY SAY? DO THEY HAVE ANY HORSE IN THIS RACE? DOES REPUBLIC THEY ARE TRYING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE OTHER LOTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SO IT'S BEEN FINALIZED AND THEY NEED TO AMEND THAT TO MAKE THOSE TWO LOTS LARGER BUT THE DEVELOPER WAS AWARE AND WE DIDN'T HEAR ANY OTHER CONCERNS FROM HOA OR OTHER RESIDENTS INTHE NEIGHBORHOOD. >> I'M GOING TO HOLD MY FURTHER THOUGHTS UNTIL AFTER
THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT I AM ALL ABOUT EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT. >> YOUR FIGURE LOOKED READY.
>> SO CAN WE PUT THE PLOT BACK UP? IT'S PART OF THE EXISTING PUD.
WHAT ARE THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO IT AND WHAT ARE THOSE OWNERS POSITIVE OPINIONS
ABOUT THIS? >> SO THIS IS THE PARCEL HERE, AND THIS OWNER -- THIS IS THE ONE THAT SOLD IT. AND THEN THERE WAS KATIE I THINK THERE IS A PARCEL THAT
KIND OF TOUCHES ENOUGH AT THE CORNER THERE. >> ONE IS THE -- WHAT ABOUT TO
THE WEST. >> THOSE WERE THE TWO PEOPLE THAT CAME TO THE MEETING, AND I CAN'T REMEMBER IF ONE OR BOTH SPOKE AT THE MEETING. I DON'T IF ANYBODY IS HERE TONIGHT. I THINK ONE OF THEM ASKED FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ALONG THIS EASEMENT SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS PROPOSED HERE. BUT AT THE TIME -- THERE'S THIS TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT THE 30 FOOT TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AND THAT WOULD BE MAINTAINED. AND THEN THEY ADDED THE 15 FOOT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT TO ADD ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS AND THEN THIS IS A DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENT.
TO THE SELLER AND THE BUYER NEGOTIATED THE ADDITIONAL EASEMENT.
>> THESE LOTS ARE NOT BEING DEVELOPED? THEY ARE BEING ACQUIRED: WILL
BE DEVELOPMENT ON THESE PROPERTIES? >> RIGHT.
THE EASEMENTS GO ALL THE WAY OUT TO THIS LINE. THESE EASEMENTS WERE ON THESE TWO LOTS SO THE EASEMENTS CAME IN AND MADE THEM SMALLER BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE
EXTRA AREA IN THE BACK. >> YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF -- SHOWING THE HOMES THAT ARE
THERE? >> DO YOU HAVE PROPOSED PLANS? >> THEY WERE ASKING FOR THE SAME DEAL AS THE NORTH BUT IT CAME UP AND STAFF REPORTED TO US THAT THAT DEAL WAS NOT THROUGH THE CITY. IT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT WE HAD. HAT WAS A PRIVATE DEAL FROM A
LAND SELLER TO A LAND BUYER. >> MAYBE YOU CAN FILL ME IN. O I UNDERSTAND THE LINE OVER TO THE NORTH, THE LAND OWNERS OR OWNERS TO THE WEST, THEIR CONCERNS HAVE BEEN MET, IS THAT
CORRECT? >> WELL, NO. THEY WANTED THE SAME BUFFER THAT WAS NEGOTIATED IN THE LAND DEAL, BUT STAFF CAME FORWARD AND SAID THAT'S NOT A REQUIRED THING. THAT WAS A PRIVATE DEAL BETWEEN THE BUYER AND SELLER FOR THAT NORTHERN PROPERTY. WHEN THEY WERE SELLING THE LAND THEY SAID WHEN IF I SELL IT TO I WANT THIS. THAT DOESN'T MEAN EVERYONE ELSE GETS THE SAME THING.
[00:45:03]
THAT WAS ALL THEIR CONCERNS. YES. >> BUT THEY WERE FINE WITH IT
NOW WITHOUT THIS ADDITIONAL MEDICATION. >> THEY DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM
WITH THAT HAPPENING. THEY WANTED ADDED. >> I'M JUST LOOKING AT THE STAFF REPORT THAT ALSO THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT DRAINAGE FOR THE NEW LOT.
HOW WAS THAT HANDLED? >> THERE WAS DISCUSSION AND I BELIEVE IT WAS AT THE MEETING THEY WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE CITY STANDARDS FOR DRAINAGE AND THAT EXISTING --
THEY WILL ACCOMMODATE DRAINAGE ON SITE FOR THE CITY STANDARDS. >> THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER THING
THAT WAS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE I OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING? I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:46 AND 15 SECONDS.
ALL OF THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK FOR AND AGAINST, PLEASE COME RUSHING FORWARD.
6:46 AND 30 SECONDS ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION OR
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. >> I WOULD MOVE TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND ACT ON THIS TONIGHT.
>> SECOND. >> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE.
6-0. WE CAN ACT ON THIS. >> MR. PRESIDENT, I MOVE THAT
WE APPROVE THIS ORDINANCE. >> SECOND. >> ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE VOTE. 6-0. MOVING ON.
[16. OTHER BUSINESS]
NEW BUSINESS. WE HAVE TIME. 15 AGENDA ADD-ON ITEMS. WE HAVE NONE. OTHER BUSINESS. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS.HAMILTON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT BOARD. TERM EXPIRES 12-31-23.
ONE APPOINTMENT. >> MR. PRESIDENT, I NOMINATE SUE THINK THEM.
>> ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? LET'S VOTE ON IT.LEASE VOTE 6-0.
SECOND IS THE CARMEL CLAY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD. TERM EXPIRES 6/30/25.
ONE APPOINTMENT. WITHOUT OBJECTION, PEOPLE HAVE TALKED ABOUT OTHER POSSIBLE CANDIDATES, SO I WAS GOING TO TABLE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING WITHOUT OBJECTION.
MOVING ON, B. PROPERTY ABATEMENT COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS AND THE DEADLINE WAS MAY 15, 2021. WE HAVE 13 LISTED HERE. THIS WILL BE GOING TO FINANCE TO ADD TO YOUR SMALL TASK THAT YOU TAKE ON REGULARLY. 17 ANNOUNCEMENTS.
ANY
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.