[A. Call Meeting to Order]
[00:00:04]
>> GOOD EVENING GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE JUNE 20, 202020
[B. Pledge of Allegiance]
MEETING. PLEASE RISE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AS WE BRING THE MEETING TO ORDER.[C.. Roll Call]
THANK YOU MR. SECRETARY WILL YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.(ROLL CALL). >> WE ARE ALL PRESENT THEREFORE
[D. Declaration of Quorum]
WE HAVE A QUORUM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.[E. Approval of Minutes]
>> ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MINUTES SAY AYE.
[F. Communications, Bills, Expenditures, & Legal Counsel Report]
ANY OPPOSED? THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED.[G. Reports, Announcements & Department Concerns]
COMMUNICATIONS, BILLS, EXPENDITURES AND LEGAL COUNSEL>> AND FOR THE DEPARTMENT? >> THANK YOU.
JUST GIVE ME ONE SECOND. FROM THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS HAVE THE COMMERCIAL MEETINGS, THE BJ'S WHOLESALE'S WAS APPROVED.
THE AMENDMENT WAS TABLED PREVIOUSLY TO THE JUNE 27 MEETING. AT COMMITTEE WE HEARD THE ANDREWS PUD THAT WAS DISCUSSED. THEY CONTINUED IN AND WE DECIDED TO GIVE THEM MORE TIME TO WORK THROUGH ITEMS AND MAY BE GET BACK WITH SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS AS WELL.
LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS WELL AS THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR THE PRAIRIE REZONED THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE LAST MEETING AND THAT WAS CONTINUED UNTIL JUNE 29.
OTHER THAN THAT WE ONLY HAVE ONE PROJECT ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT,
NO TABLING, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.
THAT DOES TAKERS TO THE ONE PUBLIC HEARING ON OUR AGENDA.
[H. Public Hearings]
IT IS TO DOCKETS. PUBLIC HEARINGS, OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES PROVIDE FOR 15 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS BY THE PETITIONER FOLLOWED BY PUBLIC COMMENT UP TO 20 MINUTES.THE PETITIONER CAN THEN RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS FOR 5 MINUTES.
THEN WE HAD THE DEPARTMENT REPORT AT -- AFTER WHICH TIME THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSE. WITH THAT THERE ARE TO DOCKETS RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS THIS EVENING.
THEY ARE 19 ROBBINS MINOR SUBDIVISION.
AND DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2023-00096 PP/SP: REQUIRED A 100-FOOT -- AND DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2023-00065 V: UDO SEC. 2.08 AND 20-FOOT IS REQUESTED HERE. THE APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO SPLIT ONE PARCEL INTO FOUR RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED 11400 WESTFIELD BOULEVARD. THE PETITION WAS FILED BY ANDREW ON BEHALF OF KEVIN SILVIUS. THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
>> GOOD EVENING MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE RECORD MY NAM IS ANDY W. I'M WITH A LAW FIRM.
HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF OUR CLIENT TO SUCCEED, KEVIN AS BEEN A FAMILY REPRESENTATIVE FOR OUR PETITION.
HE IS IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT AS WELL AS SOME OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS. ALSO WITH US IS AND THE CASH.
WE ARE PROPOSING A SUBDIVISION THAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A HOME BUILT IN 1950. SO WITH THREE NEW BUILDING SITES, ALL LOTS WILL HAVE FRONTAGE ON WESTFIELD BOULEVARD.
WE DO ANTICIPATE ONE OF THESE LOTS UTILIZING THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND WE WILL HAVE AND EGRESS EASEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. WE ARE SEEKING A LOT, YOUR ORDINANCE STANDARDS AND TOTAL WIDTH IS 295 FEET SO WE ARE ASKING FOR A REDUCTION TO 20 FEET ON ONE OF THE LOTS WON OF THE FACTORS WE RUN INTO IS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL
[00:05:04]
BILLING SITES, THAT DETENTION AREA WILL BE A DRIED DETENTION POND AND IT HAS TO BE IN ITS OWN COMMON AREA.BECAUSE OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST PORTION TAKING UP FRONTAGE. WE HAVE DONE THROUGH TECHNICAL REVIEW ON THIS. MOST COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CURSORY DOCUMENTATION THAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ADDRESS.
THERE IS A GAS PIPELINE THAT RUNS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. WE WILL NOT BE DISTURBING THAT NOR GETTING INTO THE PIPELINE EASEMENT.
WE WILL BE TAPPING INTO THE SLOWER THAT RUNS SOUTH OF THE GAS LINE. THE CITY'S THOROUGHFARE PLAN CALLS FOR A PATH ON WESTFIELD BOULEVARD.
AT THIS LOCATION WE WILL BE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION.
THE FIRST RIGHT OF WAY 45 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF WESTFIELD.
JUST TO WRAP UP THINGS FOR THIS INTRODUCTION, I WILL LET YOU ASK QUESTIONS. THE PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE BUILDINGS FOR FAMILY MEMBERS AND REFLECTING THAT WE WILL BE CHANGING THE NAME OF THE SUBDIVISION, SORT OF A PLACEHOLDER ROBBINS MINOR SUBDIVISION.
AGAIN ANDY IS HERE IF YOU HAVE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TONIGHT.
>> THANK YOU. WE MOVED TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION CAN I SEE THE HANDS THAT WISH TO SPEAK EITHER IN SUPPORT OR IN OPPOSITION. 1.
SO WE HAVE A BLOCK OF TIME OF 2. IF YOU WOULD BEGIN BY INTRODUCING YOURSELF BY NAME IN THE AREA AND COMMUNITY THAT YOU
LIVE. >> MY NAME IS LINK MATHIS, WE OWN THE PROPERTY ON THIS DRIVE. I THINK IT IS WONDERFUL THAT THE FAMILY WANTS TO DO THIS AND I CAN'T SEE ANY REASON WHY THIS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED PARTICULARLY GIVEN THE BUILDING THAT IS GOING ON IN CARMEL RIGHT NOW.
I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR ANYONE ELSE BUT OUR STREET AS 11 HOUSES ON IT. AND I DON'T SEE ANYONE ELSE HERE AND THERE WAS NO OBJECTION WE HAD FOR ANY OTHER NEIGHBORS MOST IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS DEVELOPMENT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WISH TO SPEAK. ANYONE ELSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK SO
WE CAN DIVIDE UP THE TIME. >> I AM NOT PARTICULARLY OPPOSED WOULD SINCE I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THESE ARRANGEMENTS, WHEN WILL WE LEARN ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND WILL TAKE PLACE, ANYONE WANT TO HELP ME WITH THAT?
>> PERHAPS THE PETITIONER WILL CHOOSE TO RESPOND TO YOUR QUESTIONS WHEN THEY HAVE A CHANCE.
>> MAYBE THEY WANT TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.
>> WE WILL MOVE TO THE DEPARTMENT REPORT ALEXIA.
>> WE APPRECIATE THE NEIGHBORS REPORT.
WE ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO KNOW , THEY WILL BE CUSTOM HOMES
[00:10:07]
AND I THINK AND THESE WILL BE GOOD QUALITY HOMES COMPARABLE TOTHE ONES ON SITE. >> NOW THE DEPARTMENT REPORT.
SO THIS PLOT IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN SOME THAT WE SEE.
IT IS CONSIDERED A MINOR SUBDIVISION.
THE PETITIONER IS PROPOSING TO SPLIT IT INTO FOUR LOTS.
THREE ARE CLOSER TO WESTFIELD BOULEVARD AND THE CURRENT HOME WILL BE TO THE BACK THERE. LOTS 1-3 WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF OF THE CURRENT DRIVEWAY. PART OF THE ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION WILL ALSO BE PROPOSING RUNOFF DRAINAGE AND A COMMON AREA. THE TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE SAVED. THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL TREES NEAR THE POND. AS THE PETITIONER STATED THEY HAVE REDUCED THE LOT WITH AND THAT IS BEING REVIEWED AS THE COMMON COMMITTEE PROCESS. THEN THEY WIDEN OUT FURTHER SO THEY WILL THEN IT GETS WIDER TOWARDS THE BACK THIS WILL GIVE EACH PROPERTY SOME FRONTAGE ALONG WESTFIELD BOULEVARD.
WE DON'T BELIEVE THIS WILL HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT WE DO RECOMMEND YOU APPROVE THIS ITEM AND YOU WILL NEED TO VOTE TO THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO MEET HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AND WE WILL REVIEW THAT WHEN THE BUILDING PERMITS COME IN.
THANK YOU. >> THAT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION.
CAN YOU TELL ME THE WIDTH OF EACH LOTS.
THIS WILL ONLY HAVE THE 20-FOOT FRONTAGE.
WHAT IS AT THE WIDEST. >> I SHOULD HAVE MADE THIS BIGGER. ANDY, DO YOU RECALL WHAT THEY
ARE. >> AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THAT
WITH. >> LOT FOUR, I'M TRYING TO THINK WHAT WILL GO ON THE 20-FOOT LOT. OBVIOUSLY IT IS JUST THAT ONE
PORTION. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[00:15:08]
I JUST THINK IT IS A WONDERFUL IDEA.>> I WILL SECOND DEBBIE'S COMMENT.
I THINK IT IS GREAT. >> IT SEEMS LIKE A NO-BRAINER SUPPORTING THE FAMILY, I THINK THAT'S GREAT.
MY ONLY COMMENT AS THE PARK SKY, ONLY TWO COMMENTS, FIRST OF ALL, THE COMMON AREA, I WOULD LOVE A COMMITMENT THAT IT IS GOING TO BE MORE NATURALIZED TO MATCH THE ENTRANCE OF THE PARK SYSTEM.
I AM GETTING A HEAD NOD SO THAT COULD BE A COMMITMENT.
I'M NOT OVERLY CONCERNED WITH THIS.
YOU HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A GOOD NEIGHBOR AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED. BUT IF YOU HAVE PRIVATE ACCESS ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY TO PARKS, I WOULD MAYBE ASK THAT YOU CALL MICHAEL TO MAKE SURE IT IS KOSHER WITH THEM.
JUST THINK YOU WILL CONTINUE TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR WORKS FOR ME.
OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO OFFER.
>> A QUESTION ABOUT THE DRIVEWAY FOR LOT THREE.
I SEE IT IS INDICATED FOR TWO AND FOUR, I WAS CURIOUS BECAUSE
DRIVEWAYS ARE SHOWN. >> THIS WOULD COME FROM THE
REAR. >> WOULD YOU BE PLOTTING THE STORY WE WOULD NOT HAVE A MISTAKE OR AN OMITTED EASEMENT.
>> THAT IS SHOWN ON THEIR. >> I THINK THEY SHOW THAT ON HERE. THIS IS COMING IN OFF OF THE BOULEVARD. AND THEN THERE IS, IF YOU WERE TO TURN TO THE NORTH THERE'S ANOTHER ONE THAT GOES NORTH TO PROVIDE DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR LOTS TWO AND THREE.
>> WHICH SET OF DOTTED LINES, IS THAT EASEMENT REPRESENTED ON
THIS PLAN? >> YES, REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN
IS VERY HELPFUL. >> SOLD THE EXTENT OF THE EASEMENT TO THE NORTH IS THIS LOCATION.
WE CAN SEE THE LOTS OFF OF THE INGRESS/EGRESS, AND THEN THE EASEMENT IS BOXED OUT RIGHT HERE.
THAT WOULD GIVE ACCESS TO THOSE TWO LOTS.
>> I GUESS I MISUNDERSTOOD. SHOW ME THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF LOT THREE. IT MUST COME DOWN TOWARDS THE COMMON ACCESS DRIVE. SO, LOT THREE IS A PRESHAPED LOT. MORE THAN THAT.
IT EXTENDS FROM THE LARGE AREA OF BOTH SOUTH AND EAST, IS THAT
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUBDIVISION IN EXTENDS AT 20-FOOT. WE MAY HAVE SOME FRONTAGE.
THAT IS THE PURPOSE, NOT NECESSARILY FOR A DRIVEWAY.
AND WE ARE WITHIN THE PIPELINE EASEMENT TOO.
>> I AM SORRY, I MISUNDERSTOOD THE SOUTHERN LEG.
>> I MOVED TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND -- LIMITED MY GLASSES.
AND DOCKET NUMBER DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2023-00065 V: UDO SEC. 2.08.
[00:20:05]
>> SECOND TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND APPROVE YOUR.
>> WE WOULD HAVE THE MAJORITY STANDARD.
THE FIRST IS TO SUSPEND OUR RULES WITH RESPECT TO NOT SENDING THIS TO COMMITTEE. ALL IN FAVOR OF SUSPENDING THE RULES SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, ANY OPPOSED, RULES SUSPENDED.
NOW DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2023-00096 PP/SP: AND DOCKET NUMBER PZ-2023-00065 V: UDO SEC. 2.08 I THINK THAT AS A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED?
BOTH ARE APPROVED. >> I BELIEVE THERE'S NOTHING ELSE ON THE AGENDA FOR THIS
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.